that's awesome. they couldn't convict beyond a reasonable doubt because the law is too vague.
i'm sure it will be hard to convict beyond a "reasonable doubt" wether a patient has enough marijuana "consistent with their needs".
great news if you aren't a dying breed aka PROHIBITIONIST.
i'm sure it will be hard to convict beyond a "reasonable doubt" wether a patient has enough marijuana "consistent with their needs".
great news if you aren't a dying breed aka PROHIBITIONIST.