I guess it could be said that stimulating consumption hasn't done a dang thing. A stimulus to consumption is always (as in first) a stimulus to prices as market participants seek to address the additional demand with higher prices, then labor increases to the means of production. When the stimulus ends so do the jobs.
I think this proves that free-market economies are not cycles but linear events:
There is a stimulus to the demand schedule for capital investment. This stimulates the demand schedule for the production of labor. This stimulates competition which moderate prices. Politicians have the awful habit of trying to buy votes by pretending that stimulating the south end of the beast (consumption) will make it work just as if they had fed the north end of the beast which it obviously can't.
Therefore:
Every stimulus to the non-productive side of the private-sector economy for the purposes of increasing consumption is always going to be counter-productive and create more unemployment than what existed before the cycle because; the cost of government cannot be avoided and government refuses to undertake its fiscal policies in strict adherence with the dictates of Rational Choice Theory.
That aught get the discussion perkin' along this morning (or so it is to be hoped)...
I think this proves that free-market economies are not cycles but linear events:
There is a stimulus to the demand schedule for capital investment. This stimulates the demand schedule for the production of labor. This stimulates competition which moderate prices. Politicians have the awful habit of trying to buy votes by pretending that stimulating the south end of the beast (consumption) will make it work just as if they had fed the north end of the beast which it obviously can't.
Therefore:
Every stimulus to the non-productive side of the private-sector economy for the purposes of increasing consumption is always going to be counter-productive and create more unemployment than what existed before the cycle because; the cost of government cannot be avoided and government refuses to undertake its fiscal policies in strict adherence with the dictates of Rational Choice Theory.
That aught get the discussion perkin' along this morning (or so it is to be hoped)...