What's new

Support for legalizing marijuana grows rapidly around U.S.

.
Approval for medical use expands alongside criticism of prohibition

By Karl Vick
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, November 23, 2009



The same day they rejected a gay marriage ballot measure, residents of Maine voted overwhelmingly to allow the sale of medical marijuana over the counter at state-licensed dispensaries.

Later in the month, the American Medical Association reversed a longtime position and urged the federal government to remove marijuana from Schedule One of the Controlled Substances Act, which equates it with heroin and cocaine.

A few days later, advocates for easing marijuana laws left their biannual strategy conference with plans to press ahead on all fronts -- state law, ballot measures, and court -- in a movement that for the first time in decades appeared to be gaining ground.

"This issue is breaking out in a remarkably rapid way now," said Ethan Nadelmann, executive director of the Drug Policy Alliance. "Public opinion is changing very, very rapidly."

The shift is widely described as generational. A Gallup poll in October found 44 percent of Americans favor full legalization of marijuana -- a rise of 13 points since 2000. Gallup said that if public support continues growing at a rate of 1 to 2 percent per year, "the majority of Americans could favor legalization of the drug in as little as four years."

A 53 percent majority already does so in the West, according to the survey. The finding heartens advocates collecting signatures to put the question of legalization before California voters in a 2010 initiative.

At last week's International Drug Reform Conference, activists gamed specific proposals for taxing and regulating pot along the lines of cigarettes and alcohol, as a bill pending in the California Legislature would do. The measure is not expected to pass, but in urging its serious debate, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger (R) gave credence to a potential revenue source that the state's tax chief said could raise $1.3 billion in the recession, which advocates describe as a boon.

There were also tips on lobbying state legislatures, where measures decriminalizing possession of small amounts have passed in 14 states. Activists predict half of states will have laws allowing possession for medical purposes in the near future.

Interest in medical marijuana and easing other marijuana laws picked up markedly about 18 months ago, but advocates say the biggest surge came with the election of Barack Obama, the third straight president to acknowledge having smoked marijuana, and the first to regard it with anything like nonchalance.

"As a kid, I inhaled," Barack Obama famously said on the campaign. "That was the whole point."

In office, Obama made good on a promise to halt federal prosecutions of medical marijuana use where permitted by state law. That has recalibrated the federal attitude, which had been consistently hostile to marijuana since the early 1970s, when President Richard Nixon cast aside the recommendations of a presidential commission arguing against lumping pot with hard drugs.

Allen St. Pierre, the executive director of the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws, said he was astonished recently to be invited to contribute thoughts to the Office of National Drug Control Policy. Obama's drug czar, Gil Kerlikowske, was police chief in Seattle, where voters officially made enforcement of marijuana laws the lowest priority.

"I've been thrown out of the ONDCP many times," St. Pierre said. "Never invited to actually participate."

Anti-drug advocates counter with surveys showing high school students nationwide already are more likely to smoke marijuana than tobacco -- and that the five states with the highest rate of adolescent pot use permit medical marijuana.

"We are in the prevention business," said Arthur Dean, chairman of the Community Anti-Drug Coalitions of America. "Kids are getting the message tobacco's harmful, and they're not getting the message marijuana is."

In Los Angeles, city officials are dealing with elements of public backlash after more than 1,000 medical marijuana dispensaries opened, some employing in-house physicians to dispense legal permission to virtually all comers. The boom town atmosphere brought complaints from some neighbors, but little of the crime associated with underground drug-dealing.

Advocates cite the latter as evidence that, as with alcohol, violence associated with the marijuana trade flows from its prohibition.

"Seriously," said Bruce Merkin, communications director for the Marijuana Policy Project, an advocacy group based in the District, "there is a reason you don't have Mexican beer cartels planting fields of hops in the California forests."

But the controversy over the dispensaries also has put pressure on advocates who specifically champion access for ailing patients, not just those who champion easing marijuana laws.

"I don't want to say we keep arm's length from the other groups. You end up with all of us in the same room," said Joe Elford, counsel for Americans for Safe Access, which has led the court battle for medical marijuana and is squaring off with the Los Angeles City Council. "It's a very broad-based movement."
 
J

JackTheGrower

Marijuana Law Reform Is A Political Opportunity — Not A Political Liability

Marijuana Law Reform Is A Political Opportunity — Not A Political Liability

This looks like it will fit in this thread!

Marijuana Law Reform Is A Political Opportunity — Not A Political Liability
November 20th, 2009 By: Paul Armentano, NORML Deputy Director


Last January I proclaimed in the The Hill’s Congress blog: “Marijuana law reform is no longer a political liability; it’s a political opportunity.” Ten months later it appears that an unprecedented number of state-elected officials are heeding the message. Here’s just a sample.

COLORADO: Last week the Commission on Criminal and Juvenile Justice recommended legislators to substantially reduce marijuana penalties so that the possession of up to four ounces of pot would classified as a petty offense. Offenses involving greater amounts of cannabis (up to 16 ounces) would be reduced to a misdemeanor. State Attorney General John Suthers told the Denver Post that he supports the Commission’s recommendations which, if enacted, would make Colorado’s pot possession laws among the most lenient in the nation.

RHODE ISLAND: A special nine-member Senate panel met for the first time this week to debate revising the state’s criminal marijuana policies. The panel’s chair, Democrat Sen. Joshua Miller, said that the task-force will primarily focus on the subject of decriminalization, but that members will also likely debate the merits of taxing a regulating the adult use of cannabis. The panel’s recommendations to the legislature are due on January 10, 2010. In 2009, Rhode Island’s legislature became only the second to approve legislation licensing the establishment of medical cannabis dispensaries.

WISCONSIN: Democrat Gov. Jim Doyle recently announced his support for legislation that seeks to make Wisconsin the fourteenth state to allow for the legal use of medical cannabis. Both the Assembly and the Senate Public Health Committees are scheduled to hear testimony in favor of the legislation, known as the Jacki Rickert Medical Marijuana Act, on Tuesday, December 15, 2009.

WASHINGTON: Incoming Seattle city attorney Peter Holmes announced this week that his office will no longer charge anyone with simple marijuana possession offenses. “We’re not going to bring any more (marijuana possession) charges,” he said. There are other more important, more pressing public safety matters in need of attention with the limited resources we have.” Holmes added that he supports legislation that stalled in 2009 that seeks to depenalize marijuana. Those proposals are expected to be heard by the legislature in 2010.

PENNSYLVANIA: Next month legislators will hold their first hearing — ever — on legalizing the use of medical cannabis. The House Committee on Health and Human Services will hear testimony on HB 1393, The Barry Busch Compassionate Use Medical Marijuana Act of 2009, on Wednesday, December 2, at 11am in Room 140 of the Main Capitol. Contact Philly NORML for further details.

ARKANSAS: Democrat Senator Randy Laverty announced this week that he is considering introducing legislation to lessen or eliminate criminal penalties for marijuana possession offenses. Legislators in several other states, including New Hampshire and Texas, are also expected to debate marijuana legalization proposals in 2010.

CALIFORNIA: In the coming months legislators are expected to hold additional hearings on Assembly Bill 390, the Marijuana Control, Regulation, and Education Act, which seeks to tax and regulate the commercial production and retail sale of cannabis to those age 21 or older. The California Assembly Committee on Public Safety is anticipated to vote on the measure by late January. The vote will mark the first time that California, or the legislature of any state, has voted on the issue of cannabis regulation in over three decades.

By any standard, 2010 will be a historic year for legislative activity regarding marijuana law reform. Will you play a role in bringing common sense marijuana regulations to your community? Get active, get NORML, and be the change you want to see!
 

meduser180056

Active member
I still think if it was to put to a vote in any US state [even california] right now it would not pass by at least a 10% margin.

California recently voted to ban gay marriage and it's supposedly the most liberal state in the nation.

Good luck getting marijuana legalization passed. The right wingers will be out en masse sinking tons of money into defeating the initiative.

Shit Obama even said the word legalization isn't in his vocabulary. ahah
 
J

JackTheGrower

I still think if it was to put to a vote in any US state [even california] right now it would not pass by at least a 10% margin.

California recently voted to ban gay marriage and it's supposedly the most liberal state in the nation.

Good luck getting marijuana legalization passed. The right wingers will be out en masse sinking tons of money into defeating the initiative.

Shit Obama even said the word legalization isn't in his vocabulary. ahah

Well I've always supported change now but the reality is we may have to work on it into 2012..

Something will change but that I must accept the conservative idea of legalization is not my idea of cannabis freedom.

Remember we all need to donate to Norml, MPP , California Cannabis Initiative and others.. The war is not Won by a long shot..

Also remember Southern African American Slaves were given rights then they were told at gun point to stay away from the voting booth.
many were killed to frighten others to not expect those rights.

We are facing the discrimination battle even after we have the rights to legally consume cannabis
 

fatigues

Active member
Veteran
California recently voted to ban gay marriage and it's supposedly the most liberal state in the nation.

Maine voted earlier this month to disapprove gay marriage in that state too. The vote was narrowly decided, about 4% difference.

The same electorate voted by a 59 to 41 margin to expend medical marijuana laws in Maine and provide for dispensaries.

While there were many people (including me) who had been very concerned about the impact that a higher turnout of right wing voters might have on the Maine marijuana ballot measure, it appears that intuition was very wrong. Even a bunch of folks who think poorly of gay marriage still think quite highly of marijuana.

So I think your drawing an association between gay marriage and marijuana legalization is ill founded. Clearly, there are a large number of conservatives who will vote no to either measure (and many more besides, too). The real test is not how conservatives feel and think, rather, how those persuadable voters in the middle will vote as they are the slice of the electorate that holds the balance of power. In Maine on a more narrow MMJ question, it was pretty clear that a fifth of those who are against gay marriage are still very pro-pot.

That was a gratifying result.

I do not believe that the California legalization ballot initaitive will fail if they are well supported, well funded, and if there is one clear choice before the voters in Nov 2010. It may be a close call, but this vote is utterly winnable, imo.

Gay marriage or no.
 

meduser180056

Active member
I hear ya I just don't really think it would pass.
I actually don't believe that prop215 would have passed if people knew how it was going to play out. Many people that voted for the prop were under the mistaken impression that it was only for the serious ill or dying.
There will be so much propaganda scaring people saying their kids are going to become addicted to high powered modern pot yada yada... They will scare the people into voting no on legalization.
Anyhow I'm pretty sure the most recent california poll showed more people against legalization than for it. Who knows the polls could be total bullshit anyhow.
Guess I don't have much faith in the intelligence of our voters here. I mean we did vote in a bad action movie actor that can barely speak english as our celebrity governor...
 

Latest posts

Latest posts

Top