What's new

My Grassroots Research

DSM

Member
About me:

I have been reading the forums for some time now. I am new to growing. I enjoy improving efficiency in all things, and believe there is ALWAYS room to improve ANYTHING!


Scenario Background:

I have noticed the use of Cool Tubes for HID lighting. It seems that cooling HID lighting is an absolute must. I have been working on a couple small grow boxes for use with CFL's (Thanks Dr Green Genes for turning me onto CFL's - In my book they are the cats ass!). I quickly notticed that although CFL's run cool compared incandescent bulbs, they are by no means "COOL".

As I was building a PC grow box I had an idea... WHY NOT USE A COOL TUBE SYSTEM FOR CFL'S??? I decided to try the idea and the case was made into a prototype.

I KNOW a cool tube would greatly cool the CFL's, allowing plants to grow closer to the bulbs without burning and or allowing a larger margin of error. I HOPE this can also allow the case to run a cooler ambient temperature.

Sure CFL's are not that hot, but if you can alleviate the need to use AC on your grow, or you can get away with fewer or lower speed fans, ESPECIALLY FOR A STEALTH GROW why wouldn't you? If you are building a box from scratch this is likely less of a concern for you, but if you are using a PC case space is tight. Being able to get an inch closer to the lights could make a big difference.

So I built my version of a cool tube into my PC case. This is just a prototype, so I just took the easy (READ ugly, sloppy) method to make it work for now. I finally got around to running some tests this evening. I am still running these tests as I write. I will post some pictures first and use them to explain my test methodology.

***MEMO*** I should have pictures posted within the half hour along with some test results. About an hour later the full results from my first test run should be posted. ***


Design and Setup:


I used a piece of sheet metal to make the black portion (main body for the individual cool tube runners. It was quick and easy to shape.

I decided to have each tube cover a small amount of the bulb. the ballasts are running COLD, and I felt this would help direct the air flow over the bulbs to maximize cooling (while loosing a minimal amount of light).

Ideally the bulb would have an equal ring of air flow around the ballast, creating an even air flow across the bulb. Mine are crooked. But this is the prototype.


I decided to use the exhaust tubing to guide the air (instead of a glass tube across the length of the bulb) for 2 reasons.
1 - I did not have any glass tubing readily available.
2 - My partial tubes never need to be cleaned. More air flow = more dust. They can get a nice thick layer of dust and not affect light output :) I like low maintenance stuff!
picture.php




I used some automotive exhaust piping for the individual cool tube runners. Its readily available, reasonably priced and heat won't affect it.
picture.php




The individual runners are secured to the black "tube" with an air tight seal of hot glue. The "back" side of the tubes are open within the black tube.
picture.php




2 x 23w bulbs were used for the testing. Only 46 watts. I would expect a greater temperature differences if you are using between 100 - 200 watts of cfls.
picture.php




This was the position of the air temp sensor for the first 2 tests. At which point I realized I should try to put the sensor in the very center of the case. The numbers would be more realistic (due to the location of the plants).
picture.php




This was the position of the air temp sensor for tests 3 and 4. I feel it will provide information with greater accuracy. 2 tests were to make use of the cool tubes. For these (Tests 1 & 4) I covered the left socket hole with tape to seal it. Tests 2 & 3 were for comparison so I removed the tape to by-pass the cooling tube. Some air was still being pulled through the cool tubes, but it was a VERY small amount compared to the air drawn in the hole on the left.

The black box attached to the back of the case is a squirrel cage blower. The blower draws directly from the black rectangular tube. I do not know how many cfm it flows, but it is surely overkill for the small case. I found it in the workshop room when I moved into the house. Yeah free stuff kicks ass! Now that I think of it I will test the blower later to add that information.
picture.php



TEST METHODOLOGY
* Air temps were measured with an indoor/outdoor combination thermometer (unit and remote sensor)
* Bulb temperatures were taken with a Mastercraft (Canadian Tire) brand infrared thermometer (remote temp gun)
* I used 2x 23w CFL bulbs in the case. I also used 1 of the same bulbs in a light socket in the test room, to compare. The CFL for comparison is hanging from the ceiling, wide open - no air flow, no reflector or shrouding.
* All bulb temperatures were a peak reading. I slowly ran the gun across all areas of each CFL to find a peak temperature (as I deemed this to be the most consitant method for my simplistic test).
* Each test was measured after roughly an hour. Test 1 occurred after 1 hour. Test 2 was conducted an hour after test 1 and so on.
* The left most bulb socket was never used with a bulb during testing. The "Middle" bulb shall be refered to as bulb 2. The "Right" bulb is bulb 3. The free air CFL is Bulb A.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Test 1 - Cool Tube 1
- The temp sensor is on the bottom of the case (from 0 - 5" high).
- The bulbs and fan were fired up from a cold start and ran for an hour.
- The cool tubes were in use.

Ambient Air Temp 65.6f
Ambient Case Temp 66.0f
Bulb 2 116.0f
Bulb 3 119.8f
Bulb A 228.0f


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Test 2 - Bypass 1
- The temp sensor is on the bottom of the case (from 0 - 5" high).
- The bulbs remained on
- The tape was removed from the left hole as to bypass the cool tubes. I "believe" well over 97%+ of the air came through the hole on the left. I do know a very small amount
of air passed through the cool tubes.

Ambient Air Temp 65.8f
Ambient Case Temp 67.2f
Bulb 2 148.9f
Bulb 3 144.9f
Bulb A 222.5f


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Test 3 - Bypass #2
- The temp sensor is on raised to a "center" position.
- The bulbs remained on
- The tape was removed from the left hole as to bypass the cool tubes. I "believe" well over 97%+ of the air came through the hole on the left. I do know a very small amount
of air passed through the cool tubes.

Ambient Air Temp 65.8f
Ambient Case Temp 69.4f
Bulb 2 147.6f
Bulb 3 143.3f
Bulb A 227.0f


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Test 4 - Cool Tube #2
- The temp sensor is on raised to a "center" position.
- The bulbs remained on
- The cool tubes were in use.

Ambient Air Temp 65.8f
Ambient Case Temp 68.5f
Bulb 2 #121.6f
Bulb 3 #118.4f
Bulb A #225.0f


AS I expected the cool tubes "greatly" cooled the CFL bulbs. The difference in bulb temperature is indeed noticeable. In this case it was to the tune of about 21%.

The ambient air temperature was affect but only to a small extent, about 1.5%.

2 things to keep in mind - my air flow is likely VERY high for such a small cabinet. Also the wattage during the test was very low. I look forward to retrying this test using 2 high wattage bulbs sometime soon. I also look forward to figuring out the flow rate of my fan so I we can better interrupt the test results.
 
Last edited:

DSM

Member
Any and all comments are welcome.

Especially any inquiries / advice / thoughts for the next round of testing.

Does anyone know of any threads / tests of a similar nature? IE Cooling CFL's?


Enjoy, comment and pleasant harvests all.
 

psg1

Member
i'm glad you shared your tests. cfls are, indeed, hot. more specifically, the ballast is hot. the crux, as i see it, is the extra trouble of routing the airflow directly past the cfls vs. just evacuating the air from the cab directly. one could argue that the route that you are forcing the air to take robs you of cfm over just a straight vent and thereby reducing cooling efficiency. with a powerful enough fan, air is constantly moving past the ballasts with a straight vent setup anyway, even without it being directed by your ports. just some thoughts.
 

ScrubNinja

Grow like nobody is watching
Veteran
Another way you could test it is to remove the ballast altogether from one bulb and externalize it.
 

DSM

Member
ScrubNinja - Great point about shielding the sensor. I can easily do this for the air sensor and retest sometime soon. Also I could try shutting the bulb off JUST before reading its temperature (as my temp gun uses IR to measure). I will likely do this before the end of the weekend and re-post. I think I will measure bulb temp, then unscrew the bulb and re-measure. To gain the most food for thought.

Separating the ballast for testing seems like a great rainy day project.

I am now on page 6 of your Cold Cathode thread. It's a good read and interesting idea to say the least. I always enjoy new ideas, perhaps more so if there are nay-sayers. Trying something on paper is all well and good, but there is no substitute for trial and error!

PSG - Yes I would agree the more complex routing involved in my design surely reduces the volume or air moved by a fan. I suspect it is only a small difference in flow. To me, I would give up a large portion of my air flow in exchange for cooler bulbs and ambient air. I am an automotive performance nut, and have a good understanding of air flow. As for the vertical air flow, that is a good thought. Taking advantage of the natural convection process. Some computer cases now rotate the main boards 90 degree's (Connectors on top, instead of at the back. All cards run vertical, instead of the traditional horizontal layout). This makes use of natural convection (is this an accurate term??) and they do show a small, yet significant increase in cooling performance.
 

ScrubNinja

Grow like nobody is watching
Veteran
Thanks man, I owe that whole idea to grow1620 really. I was just going to mount them on the side like the high pod. If he hadn't mentioned the idea of using it as a scrog screen, I wouldn't have thought to tilt them. I'm having tons of fun and the plant seems to be growing fine.

I had some direct strangeness when I built my pll cab as a result of an unshielded sensor, so I thought it was important to note. Unlike that link suggests, mine actually displayed much cooler when I moved it from like a foot away, to an inch away! So long story short, I don't trust any unshielded temp reading. Not to say it was giving you falsies of course, just that the potential was there. I used a weather station similar to yours. :yes:
 

DSM

Member
ScrubNinja Check this out!!!

picture.php


I was stunned at how easy this bulb was to disassemble. 2 minutes of my time on my first try. Using the screw driver to carefully pry, and the tweezers to unwind the wires from the bulb. They were wound like 5 times and did not use solder - making it very convenient for me.

WOW, depending on the test results I may end up converting to external balasts!
 

DSM

Member
I just tried to crack open 26W CFL (As fate would have it, both bulbs are from "GE").

NO DICE. I think its glued, as I left some heavey marring on the ballast case, and it never seemed interested in opening up.
 

ScrubNinja

Grow like nobody is watching
Veteran
Hey DSM, awesome! What I did was hold the ballast firmly, and grab the metal base bit with pliers or clamps, and gently twist *a little bit in each direction, NOT MUCH* and focus on pulling it off, rather than trying to screw it round. The wires are really fragile. Once I had it off, I used pliers to rip the wires from where they were soldered to the metal cap. I think that may make it more convenient to dismantle the ballast bit. I tried a cheap ass "Brio" and it was as above. I tried a 23w Osram (my usual favourite 23w) and I forget the exact issue, but I think the workings inside were different and so it was not do-able.
 

grouchy

Active member
Is it possible to remote ballast the GE 42w cfl?

Edit: Yes it is! I will be doing a DIY writeup on this soon for anyone interested. I just made my first one tonight. Thanks for showing me how easy it is to take these apart DSM!
 

ScrubNinja

Grow like nobody is watching
Veteran
It would be really cool to take it another step forward and improve on the standard cfl design by locating the ballast somewhere fireproof like a steel box with some gentle air flow. Please use good terminals/connectors, I know you guys are professional but for anyone else thinking of trying it.
 

DSM

Member
Grouch ~ I'm always glad to share ideas, ESPECIALLY if they might influence progress!

ScrubNinja ~ Agreed. Anyone trying this should make sure things are secure and all wiring is well insulated. It's very easy to make this safe, but a little neglect could easily be dangerous!

k1net1k ~ Well played sir!
 

:-(

Member
The exhaust piping is really innovative, kudos for the idea. That epoxy looks pretty messy, I came across the same problem with epoxy in my own grow, then I purchased some plumbers epoxy, dries hard as a rock with little mess.

base_media
 
Top