What's new

CA Supreme Court Lets Stand Landmark Medical Marijuana Cultivation Ruling

Danknuggler

Active member
Just have to be a member.
4. Collectives Should Acquire, Possess, and Distribute Only Lawfully
Cultivated Marijuana: Collectives and cooperatives should acquire marijuana
only from their constituent members, because only marijuana grown by a qualified
patient or his or her primary caregiver may lawfully be transported by, or
distributed to, other members of a collective or cooperative. (§§ 11362.765,
11362.775.) The collective or cooperative may then allocate it to other members of
the group. Nothing allows marijuana to be purchased from outside the collective or
cooperative for distribution to its members. Instead, the cycle should be a closedcircuit
of marijuana cultivation and consumption with no purchases or sales to or
from non-members. To help prevent diversion of medical marijuana to nonmedical
markets, collectives and cooperatives should document each member’s
contribution of labor, resources, or money to the enterprise. They also should track
and record the source of their marijuana.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^NOW THIS PART RIGHT HERE SHOULD BE SIMLPLE for a properly ran coop or collective that does all the growing in ONE collective/coop garden as that is the source so there is no implicating anybody in the membership as growing at their residence.However a properly ran coop/collective that DOES NOT have a coop/collective garden in one spot means a whole bunch of sources to report and many won't want to report it anyways I think so that could be tricky for some.
 

PharmaCan

Active member
Veteran
but the fact they are "over the counter" proves it.

Man, you are so full of shit! Just for the hell of it, let's hear the argument you would make to a judge to show that "over the counter" proves illegality. You'd get laughed out of court if you tried.

Seriously, you have the mentality of a drug warrior. WTF are doing on this forum anyway? Don't they have drug warrior forums where you can post with like-minded people?

PC
 

Danknuggler

Active member
Man, you are so full of shit! Just for the hell of it, let's hear the argument you would make to a judge to show that "over the counter" proves illegality. You'd get laughed out of court if you tried.

Seriously, you have the mentality of a drug warrior. WTF are doing on this forum anyway? Don't they have drug warrior forums where you can post with like-minded people?

PC
So true!!!!!!!!!!! I mean seriously would walking into a building with no counter just an empty room with jars of meds on the fucking floor and no cash register shit straight out of the pocket..BlueClot you can be so @##$$I dont even want to say...
 

Hydro-Soil

Active member
Veteran
Even if it has not specificaly been adressed by the courts don't we ALL know whats really goiing on?

YES, patients that can't grow for themselves are getting desperately needed medicine. Thanks.


Now we just need to flat out legalize it so we can stop procrastinating and get back to healing the country. Recreational use is a constitutional right that was enjoyed by most of the learned and progressive men/women that built this country originally.

You need to change your meds.
 

johnnyla

Active member
Veteran
what about "Under The Counter"

maybe i should pay a cannabis attorney $5,000 to answer that question for me to make sure i'm totally legit. :) AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
 

Danknuggler

Active member
I think people like Blue Dot are seeing this through the wrong eyes or arent reading what the guidlines say exactly.You have to get over the whole caregiver thing.Caregivers are optional.I mean you can be a member amongst members.All patients for patients, all transactions are kept between members as the Ag guidlines state clearly.No where does it say you have to assign anybody as a caregiver.You can do this with or without a caregiver.Just have to follow all the rules concerning caregiving if you choose to have one.
 
K

Kola Radical

There's nothin' like landrace genetics and landmark rulings.

Gotta love those landmarks.

Lets make a mark on the land.

Take a stand.

And stick it to the man.
 
J

JackTheGrower

Blue Dot has put in some hours here. I need to reread this thread but my first thought was.. That's a bit harsh on Blue Dot.


Jack
 

Greensub

Active member
but the fact they are "over the counter" proves it.

Just to go into an exercise in semantics, it did occur to me that the phrase "over the counter" means something specific when it comes to medicine/drugs of any type. For example Prilosec OTC ("over the counter")... "over the counter" means you don't need a prescription to buy it. Everything out on the floor in a drugstore is "over the counter".

This being said... in the context of this thread Blue Dot was most likely intentionally distracting everyone from the real discussion with a red herring. Or maybe he's just so literal that he doesn't understand context.

So to be clear... I don't believe anyone here (other than Blue Dot) was talking about "over the counter" sales of marijuana to people not holding a valid recommendation (which would be illegal).
 

PharmaCan

Active member
Veteran
Blue Dot has put in some hours here. I need to reread this thread but my first thought was.. That's a bit harsh on Blue Dot.


Jack

If all he was doing was playing the devil's advocate, that would be one thing. It's good to have divergent points of view and to see what you're up against. But, BDot is a borderline troll. His attitude is like this is some kind of game and if someone can't follow his, and all the other drug warriors', strict interpretation of the rules then they deserve to get busted. Pot shouldn't be illegal for anyone! He can take his prissy attitude and put it where the sun don't shine as far as I'm concerned.

PC
 
Top