Do the maths 5% of a population.
Your maths is flawed. It's not 5% of a population, it's 5% of those who get swine flu. Your maths is based on the assumption that 100% of the population will get swine flu.
I'm not going to argue the 'swine flu' is potentially a bit worse than the 'normal flu'. My argument is historically the 'cure' has been worse than the 'disease' and I think it's important to not just accept what we're being told is good for us at face value.
If we all accepted what we were told 'was good for us' at face value 95% of the people on this forum would not be here.