What's new
  • Happy Birthday ICMag! Been 20 years since Gypsy Nirvana created the forum! We are celebrating with a 4/20 Giveaway and by launching a new Patreon tier called "420club". You can read more here.
  • Important notice: ICMag's T.O.U. has been updated. Please review it here. For your convenience, it is also available in the main forum menu, under 'Quick Links"!

WTF is with fictional pot-users!?

Some parts of stoner-related-fiction, especially more recently produced ones, seriously piss me off! I have great reguard classic stereotypical stoner characters such as Cheech and Chong because they where breaking into new territory. Sure, 99% of real stoners aren't anything like those guys acted, but at the time cannabis in cinema was a big taboo and I applaud their exaggerated stoner antics for showing just how harmless and funny the use of THC is. What fuckin irritates the hell out of me is that more than three decades later we've not advanced the role at all. Fuck that, we've gone backwards. Popular culture still sees the 'stoner' as a dopey half-wit who couldn't remember what you said 30 seconds ago, much less something reasonable like what he had for breakfast. Stoner characters in pretty much all mediums of fiction stumble through the storyline, barely aware of what's going on. Their constant state of high makes them completely disconnected with reality to the point where they are written to hilariously make no sense, or hallucinate or otherwise always be doing something ridiculous.

Case-in-point: Pineapple Express. I couldn't even sit through the whole thing, settling for a synopsis from someone who finished it. It's one thing to make a stoner movie such as "Harold and Kumar go to White Castle". That was a film about the misadventures of two idiots who happened to smoke the ganja. They got into trouble equally wheather or not they where high! Pineapple Express on the other hand features completely absurd situations that the main characters get into because they are high. The whole thing apparently culminates in an intense action-film style shootout that is fought in a grow house. No real stoner has ever participated in such a thing! Sure, drug dealers shoot eachother over their products (sometimes being marijuana) all the time, but Pineapple Express was a depiction of pot-users that just didn't sit well with me at all. Perhaps the writers where trying to make fun of the fact that this absurdity went on because of the illegality of pot. A sort of social commentary on how ridiculous the ban on cannabis is. Two harmless stoners ending up in a gun fight because their chosen activity is arbitrarily illegal. That is something I can strongly endorse and will rant more on later. However, the way the two guys just bumbled through the plotline and behaved in general irritated me to no end.

Frankly, this flies in the face of reality. Most people who's lives revolve around the cannabis plant are nothing like this. A deep relationship with THC tends to make them more connected and capable with their mental faculties, not less. The fact that they commit a felony nearly every day means that real long-term stoners are almost always shrewd and resourceful rather than dopey and weak-willed. They are unique people. They do not adorn themselves and their homes and their cars and everything else with the trappings of cannabis use. They don't always wear a pot-leaf T-shirt and/or rasta hat. In fact, these things are much more commonly indicative of a poser than a real cannabis connoisseur. I would be fine with all of this if authors of fictional content drew a line of distinction between this kind of stoner and a normal cannabis user much as they do with drunks and people who regularly drink. A regular drinker may do silly things while drunk or be over-enthusiastic about consumption or perform any other number of booze-related shenanigans while still by and large being considered a reasonable person in the context of the story line. A drunk on the other hand is the embodiment of intoxication. He/she is constantly an asshole, always voicing inappropriate opinions, being needlessly violent, having embarrassing sex, etc. The drunk encapsulates of all the typical side-effects of drinking and then turns the volume up to 11. The drunk is a caricature. Most importantly, the number of drunks in any given storyline are nearly always outweighed by the number of reasonable drinkers and the final group of characters roughly resemble what may be seen in life. Rarely is this seen translated into a distinction between pot-head and pot-user in popular fiction. Just once I would like to see a fictitious storyline which portrays habitual cannabis users in the light of what normally goes on. Unique, interesting people who have a powerful relationship with THC and the convoluted lives they are forced to live because of the government-enforced social stigma against the sacred herb.

Why don't writers expound on the irony of the illegal activity that surrounds the consumption of the safest mind-altering substance known to man. Why isn't there fiction about all of the violence and prejiduce and lies and shattered lives that have occurred and continue to occur because of the ban on a plant that is so obviously meant to live in harmony with mankind. There is a treasure trove of irony, plot-twists, suspense, jokes, action and overall drama to be derived from this absurd social dynamic. Why the fuck isn't anybody using it!? Eight bajillion uninspired, unoriginal webcomics loosely based on videogames and not a single one out there based on this endless source of material. All of the same goddamn jokes about lag or Slippy being an annoying twit or n00bs or Samus-Aran's tits or how the Metal Gear Solid series makes no fucking sense or how the cake is a lie being re-told and re-cycled over and over again! How is it that this can go on and yet not a single internet user has taken the time to boot up MS paint in order to make a joke about a pussy-ass tree-hugging hippy being tossed in jail for the ganjas and then getting shanked by a rapist. Come on! That's hilarious. Or what about the vast body of cops who arrest people for mary jane by day and then smoke the confiscated stashes at night? You can't tell me that its because there aren't enough stoners on the internet. I would wager that there is a higher ratio of pot-users among the heavy net-trawling populace than there is among the public in meatspace. There are a ton of webcomics that heavily feature a bar, why aren't there any where a number of the characters regularly meet somewhere to get stoned and then explore the resulting dynamic. I would also wager that the majority of webcomic readers would find the latter more relevant to their own lives than the former. I am totally confounded. I've scoured the internets and only been able to find two ganja-centric webcomics. One is about a stoner who dies, gets satan blazed and then sneaks back into the living world where nearly everyone has become a zombie for some reason. The other is about an anthropomorphic flower, bong, two mushrooms and other creatures who live in a woodland setting and make jokes about drugs. I must admit both of these comics are pretty well done and each made me laugh as I flipped through them. That said, they aren't anything like I describe.

What do you think ICMag? Am I on to a real paradox here or am I just ranting about something that nobody would think was funny or interesting? Would you any of you enjoy fiction based on the real-world cannabis-user dynamic? Especially in new age formats such as webcomics or indie films? Or is it just me?
 
T

theratings

I agree with you that the roles haven't changed much. It's one of those running gags to have a stoner character who acts like the ones we always see because that's the stoner image for a lot of movie goers. I liked Pineapple Express though.
 
M

movingtocally

I'm pretty sure I agree, but I don't' know you good sir, and while you may be awesome, you may suck big ass. I simply don't have it in me to find out first hand.



If you would be so kind, a cliff notes version would probably generate more responses.
 

sin-seed

Active member
I can see where you're coming from, for sure. But, how entertaining would the movie be if it showed them smoke pot, then trade stocks on Wall Street or perform open heart surgery? It's funny because of the stereotypes, even though they are largely untrue. Like the original Reefer Madness is hilarious because it's serious in it's parodying of the cannabis user. And how inner city gang movies (Boyz in the Hood, Menace II Society, etc.) are so big and popular even though most blacks in America are not gangsters. Sorry I went off on a tangent towards the end there, what were we talking about again? Oh yeah, Seth Rogen is the SHIT!!
 
Hah, finally! Over 100 WALL-O-TEXT posts and I only just now start hearing complaints about it. You are far too polite ICmag. I'm used to most people going "TL;DR" in response to even my very earliest posts upon coming to a new forum. ICmag's generally mellow atmosphere has lulled me into the sense that people actually want to read that shit.

THE SHORT VERSION

I'm consistently irritated with the persistence of the classic stoner stereotype in popular fiction (especially webcomics). I get that the exaggeration is funny and have enjoyed many films based on this concept (Harold & Kumar, Grandma's Boy). Even Pineapple Express, which I derided for the most part, does a good job of making sharp social commentary about the absurdity of banning cannabis. However the prevalence of the classic stoner has begun to bug me.

Much fiction is made about people who have to live double lives: spies, criminals, people with twisted romances, etc. I think that a more realistic cannabis user could make for some incredibly dynamic plots. I believe that there is a lot of untapped potential for deeper story lines with humor that is less shallow and predictable.

Don't get me wrong, I think that any pot-smoking character should be humorous. Habitual use of ganja tends to make one grow an extra-large funny bone. I was just wondering if any other ICmag users where as tired as me with the prevelence of the stereotypes and would like to see some interesting, dynamic, reality-esque pot smokers instead. Just a thought.

-DM
 
Holy rant batman, I'm not a 'stoner'.

I have a difficult time sifting through a short story let alone a novel of complaint lol...you had me at 'Pineapple Express sucks' :D I didn't dig it either.

I have a plethora of friends who smoke & fall under every other if not all characteristics portrayed in the movies...from the evasive paranoid to the sir humpalot hippie to the eat it all addict. I AM a people connoisseur.

What sells is what we will see the most of. The chill smoker vs the happy hilarious hippy, which ticket would you buy.

I love fun, but funny is in the eye of the beholder - Lady J
 

TwoOhSix!

Member
Yeah I get what you're saying, there's never characters that are normal people that smoke weed, always the exaggerated stereotype.
Why is this?
Because it's still taboo to portray cannabis in a realistic and normal light. Yeah it could be interesting maybe if a lawyer was hiding his huge stonerness from everyone, always baked in court, ect. But to make that stuff funny for the masses it's going to include some stereotypical shit.
It does the networks no benefit to have a random stoner storyline, and they might catch flak for it if it's progressive.
 

alaskan

Member
You've got the concepts in your head, why not write some stuff yourself? Not good at drawing? Too lazy?

Just write stuff down in a notebook. Eventually somebody will kickstart this genre, and you'll have tons of material to use/sell.

Or just smoke some more and think about it all for a few hours . . .
 
Holy rant batman, I'm not a 'stoner'.

I have a difficult time sifting through a short story let alone a novel of complaint lol...you had me at 'Pineapple Express sucks' :D I didn't dig it either.

I have a plethora of friends who smoke & fall under every other if not all characteristics portrayed in the movies...from the evasive paranoid to the sir humpalot hippie to the eat it all addict. I AM a people connoisseur.

What sells is what we will see the most of. The chill smoker vs the happy hilarious hippy, which ticket would you buy.

I love fun, but funny is in the eye of the beholder - Lady J


Heh, yea. Even though I cannot currently partake in the ganjas I still tend to make a lot of drawn-out nonsensical stoner-rants.

I was using movies as examples because thats what is most likely for people to have common ground with. I was really ranting more about fictitious literature, webcomics, popular culture, etc. Not so much about what makes a great stoner movie. Of corse, nobody will know that because nobody is gonna read that far down in my stupid rant.

I'm totally cool with the stereotypical stoner being portrayed in fiction, its hilarious, much like the stereotypical drunk. My only issue is that the unimaginative stoner mold seems to be the only one used to cast pot-smoking characters in fiction. I've yet to find a single good example of a fiction based on the convoluted lives of realistic pot-smokers. It's been done many times before for other types of drug users (a-la-Trainspotting), but those stories always feature vivid descriptions of how substances are cocking up the character's lives. Cannabis-users aren't harmed by their drug of choice at all. All of the adversity in their lives is based on an arbitrary, and I think hilarious, set of rules. Maybe I'm the only one who thinks that could be entertaining.


-DM
 
Yeah I get what you're saying, there's never characters that are normal people that smoke weed, always the exaggerated stereotype.
Why is this?
Because it's still taboo to portray cannabis in a realistic and normal light. Yeah it could be interesting maybe if a lawyer was hiding his huge stonerness from everyone, always baked in court, ect. But to make that stuff funny for the masses it's going to include some stereotypical shit.
It does the networks no benefit to have a random stoner storyline, and they might catch flak for it if it's progressive.


*nod* *nod*

Oh hell yea, I totally understand why a big TV network or movie house wouldn't take that kind of risk. Makes total sense.

What baffles me is that the internet, which generates many sorts of fiction concerning very illegal shit which is much more socially taboo than the ganjas has failed to produce any concerning it. Its a serious head-scratcher for me.

-DM
 
You've got the concepts in your head, why not write some stuff yourself? Not good at drawing? Too lazy?

Just write stuff down in a notebook. Eventually somebody will kickstart this genre, and you'll have tons of material to use/sell.

Or just smoke some more and think about it all for a few hours . . .

Hah. Quite right alaskan. If you didn't notice from my absurdly long posts I have a fondness for writing. I certainly haven't been sitting on my laurels when it comes to rectifying the situation that I'm ranting about here. I've generated a pretty significant set of storyboards and huge quantities of descriptions, dialogue, character bios, etc. along the lines of what I've been proposing in this thread.

I suppose I won't attempt to hide my true motivation here any longer. The reason I've been attemptiong to steer the conversation more towards fiction delivered via the internets is because I'm seriously considering taking a stab at it myself.

I have long been fascinated with the webcomic format and have seriously been considering starting one up. I've been framing it up much like the ubiquious gamer webcomic: a group of severely different characters sharing the common interest of videogames. Authors of these comics not only use this dynamic but are also able to make commentary on the current state of the games industry in modern culture. It is a hugely popular format with dozens of successful comics based around the same idea.

Likewise I'm thinking of a cast of habitual pot-smokers from many different walks of life. The plot could revolve around the (potentially hilarious) dynamics of their lives while giving me leeway to make commentary about the current status of cannabis in modern culture.

I figure while I'm not smoking the ganjas I would have little to fear when it comes to being very loud about my opinions concerning it. It is no coincidence that I have appeared on this forum just as I've become able to pass a drug test.

Basically I made this thread to rant but also wanted to guage the reaction of a decidedly ganja-happy community to this idea. I figure if I can't get a positive response from you guys then I won't get one from anybody.

So how about it ICmag, if the art and diologue where up to snuff would you read such a webcomic?

-DM
 

blackone

Active member
Veteran
I have noticed quite a few films where smoking weed was portrayed as pretty harmless and just not something to make a lot of fuss about.
Other times... I pretty much lost count of the number of horror movies involving a group of young people smoking a little pot, making bad decisions and then getting slashed one after another by some crazed murderer...
 
Oh heavens yes, there are plenty of true-to life stoner moments in popular film! Students smoking grass for their first time with the English prof. and waxing poetic in "Animal House" is a classic example.

I'm talking about fiction featuring characters who's lives revolve around the ganjas. In life these people are often dynamic and interesting leading quirky lives full of misadventure. I've never seen them portrayed as such.

Once again, I'm looking to gauge reactions here. Trying to see if any ICmag users find interest in the idea of fiction based on a more 'realistic' pot-smoker.

-DM
 

Pythagllio

Patient Grower
Veteran
Wow, you really haven't been following along if you think that there's no gun fire at personal grows. I never saw the movie Pineapple Express but I know in real life that rippers with guns doing home invasion robberies are very real, and sometimes the invaded resent being robbed and shoot back.
 

sackoweed

I took anger management already!!!! FUCK!!!
Veteran
Drunk: I think your last post #17 was by far your shortest post ever ... (claps)... the disclaimer is good.. peace..

sack
 
Wow, you really haven't been following along if you think that there's no gun fire at personal grows. I never saw the movie Pineapple Express but I know in real life that rippers with guns doing home invasion robberies are very real, and sometimes the invaded resent being robbed and shoot back.

absolutely! I was trying to address this fact here:

No real stoner has ever participated in such a thing! Sure, drug dealers shoot eachother over their products (sometimes being marijuana) all the time,

I am totally aware that the illegal status of cannabis causes many violent (and deadly) conflicts over it. This is the tragedy of the war on drugs and is why I gave Pineapple Express some credit. The film does a good job of making a shoot-out over a goddamn plant seem rediculous.

I did not take issue with the fact that people got shot over the ganjas, what bugs me is that a couple of dudes who are supposed to be harmless stoners (not pot-growers, not drug-dealers, not hustlers in any way) got so blazed that they ended up in a shootout. It's the boring, unrealistic characterization of the pair of pot-smokers that winds me up.

-DM
 

Latest posts

Latest posts

Top