L
lysol
Oh you don't want to consent? That's fine then I'll just call in the dogs I don't need your consent, by the way when is the last time you smoked marijuana?
They don't need a warrant, just your keys.
I was caught with some seedlings on a totally bullshit traffic stop, they made up a reason to pull me over, then made up a reason to search the car.
I told them that I just got them from someone else and was going to throw them away. It's a tight spot there, you wonder if maybe it's not always best to say nothing in that situation. They wanted to search my house and I refused.
Point of the story is, one of the pair of cops takes me to jail, and the other stays behind with the car. My house keys were separate from my car keys, and neither was included in my jail property bag when it was sealed because neither arrived with me at the jail. They magically appeared inside when I got out. The other cop did search without a warrant, while the other cop was writing the report in front of me. They were talking via cell phone the whole time, and the dude in front of me was deliberately making comments that let me know. If there had been anything worth asking for a warrant for, they would have asked for one, but they didn't have much more on me.
This was a major metropolitan police force in the USA, and I think alot of police work involves the use of illegal tactics to determine whether or not you're worth investigating; if you are, then it's just a matter of finding some way to get at you, like a bullshit traffic stop or bogus anonymous tips.
Well god damn.thus why my license has a po box on it![]()
Smokey have you ever heard of a "sneak and peek warrant"... I guess not... A sneak and peek warrant is a warrant that let's police break into a home and plant wires and other recording devices to TRY and find evidence of a crime... This happens with organized crime usually.. They do not need "proof" of crime for this.. All they need is suspicion.. They use this warrant looking for proof... Police can usually get a warrant if they want it.. Judges only sighn warrants.. They do not have intimate details of the targets and alledged crimes.. They just trust the warrant is factual and that the police did there homework... When a warrant goes to a judge he just sighns it.. I doubt he reads much of it... It is not on him/her if the proof included in the warrant is factual... They don't care... That's why a police officer has to swear that all the information in the warrant is true..
cops cannot LEGALLY take your keys and enter a private home without a warrant or consent, and snoop around hoping to find evidence.
Oh you don't want to consent? That's fine then I'll just call in the dogs I don't need your consent, by the way when is the last time you smoked marijuana?
Bluelaw: You are an attorney and cannot correctly spell: " their ' instead of ' there"? ( In the last sentence of your post). For a person with advanced degrees I am suprised at the spelling errors.Oh well, maybe English was not your forte'. You ARE correct about what you say. No judge wants to be embarrassed and few will sign off on obviously flawed warrant appplications. People imagine some judge with a rubber stamp that slams it down on any and all papers a pig proffers...not so!!
On the Internet, five minutes spent reading YouTube comments can convince even an average, level-headed person that the Internet is about to suffer the same fate. The old-fashioned holdouts who insist on typing in actual sentences see what seems to be an inexorable move toward a language based entirely on texting abbreviations. It's not hard to feel the desire to take up arms to defend language at all costs. Srsly.
We all reserve the right to mock people who post 500-word blocks of misspelled nonsense. But then you have the situation where somebody posts a perfectly clear and clever message but within their well-articulated points they dare to confuse "your" with "you're." And then somebody will flip the fuck out.
Like a Mossad agent in rural America, you quickly discover that you've found a Nazi. Of the Grammar variety.
In Real Life it's Called...
Obsessive-Compulsive Personality Disorder, or OCPD.
OCPD should not be confused with Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (or, "The OC Disorder"). OCPD shares the obsessive component of OCD, but it is different from OCD in that OCPD has the letter P in its name. That and people with OCPD do not perform the weird ritualistic actions of OCD'ers, like opening a door four times or having to always eat Pringles with the concave side up.
OCPD types simply have an incredibly strict standard by which certain tasks be done, to the point that it literally can lead to violence otherwise.
So Why Does it Happen on the Internet?
At the heart of the real-life OCPD sufferer seems to be an irrational fear that the rest of the world is sloppier, dirtier and more disorganized than it should be, that it's rapidly getting worse, and that the world will fall to pieces unless someone straightens it up.
On the Internet, five minutes spent reading YouTube comments can convince even an average, level-headed person that the Internet is about to suffer the same fate. The old-fashioned holdouts who insist on typing in actual sentences see what seems to be an inexorable move toward a language based entirely on texting abbreviations. It's not hard to feel the desire to take up arms to defend language at all costs. Srsly.