What's new
  • Happy Birthday ICMag! Been 20 years since Gypsy Nirvana created the forum! We are celebrating with a 4/20 Giveaway and by launching a new Patreon tier called "420club". You can read more here.
  • Important notice: ICMag's T.O.U. has been updated. Please review it here. For your convenience, it is also available in the main forum menu, under 'Quick Links"!

History exchange tape

minds_I

Active member
Veteran
LOL.....leave it to you to find humor in incest. But ppl are always giving rural ppl a hard time about cousin love and we hillbillys/redneck/crackers/Appalachians did not start it....the uptight and religious zealots in Europe all married relatives it seems......


Hello all,

Yeah but unlike hillbillies/rednecks/crackers/Appalachiancs I think the english aristocarcy made it point to bred with "DISTANT" cousins as opposed to first cousins or even sisters/brothers.

minds_I

Come on...squeal like pig. weee....weeee
 

madrecinco

Active member
Veteran
Elizabeth had an epiphany after her lover Robert Dudley had signed on with the rest of the traitors led by Spain to dethrone her. She then called herself a Virgin and considered herself married to England.

Sir Walter Raleigh named Virginia in order to get her attention. ;)

Yeah and the Spanish were related to Bloody Mary...but not Elizabeth.
So they wanted to whack Elizabeth....but it was more of a religious struggle and the cousins Bloody Mary,,,,Elizabeth....Katherine of Arragon....Anne....Mary Queen of Scots....Lady Jane Grey"Queen for a day"
Were all political pawns.

Mary Tudor was the only Tudor with BALLS AS she eloped with her lover Brandon after the old fart French King died that her brother Henry forced her to marry. That was considered treason in those days but Brandon was one of Henry's play buddies and friend. So he got to live.


Mary Tudor would have been a better Monarch than Henry. Henry only got it after his brother Authur died. And then Henry married his widow then tried to dump her when she got older and did not produce a son.

Katherine of Aragon was a tragic figure. The only one that survived was Anne of Cleves and she got the hell out while she could because Henry did not like her at all. Unfuckable he said....te he
 

madrecinco

Active member
Veteran
Hello all,

Yeah but unlike hillbillies/rednecks/crackers/Appalachiancs I think the english aristocarcy made it point to bred with "DISTANT" cousins as opposed to first cousins or even sisters/brothers.

minds_I

Come on...squeal like pig. weee....weeee

NAH not true at all dear. Many royalty married first cousins as well as a modern day Italian American that ran for president Guiliani married HIS 1st cousin.....Einstien many notable ppl.
Lots of european royalty did marry 1st cousins.

Actually you are ignorant if you really believe that.
 

madrecinco

Active member
Veteran
The royal and noble of Europe have inbred considerably. The Habsgurgs....Wittelsbachs and the British royal family. Queen Elizabeth NOW is married to Prince Phillip her second cousin.Why there was so many mentally retarded and disfigured and crazy loons. Like King George who Georgia was named after.....WAS NUTTIER THAN A FRUITCAKE! no doubt.
To keep the blood pure and strengthen family dynasties. That is Why Czar Nicholas son and heir had hemophilia.
Going back further Cleopatra married her brother. Some Egyptian Pharoahs married their sisters ...enogamy and polygamy was rampant. Old Rulers oldest son and daughter married to become new ruler.

And WTF was Jean V of Armagnac thinking!!!


So "minds I" you can use one finger and educate yourself at google since you don't read and yet you know EVERYTHING dear.

There is greater inbreeding within royalty than there is in the population as a whole.
 

minds_I

Active member
Veteran
Hello all,

Well, Madrecinco, I was going to let it go til I read the above response and took it upon myself to do a little googling as you suggested.

As I only have a passing interest on this subject, I just read wiki. Yes, wiki is not an oracle of wisdom to be sure so take it with a grain of salt. Also, check the references (Library of Congress online)

"....NAH not true at all dear. Many royalty married first cousins as well as a modern day Italian American that ran for president Guiliani married HIS 1st cousin.....Einstien many notable ppl.
Lots of european royalty did marry 1st cousins...."

It is true that royality practiced incest as you say for the purpose of consolidating power, wealth and/or bloodline.

So, with this said... it is clear (from what little I have read on the subject) that incest with first cousins and further distant cousins is acceptable in many cultures and is more widely practiced and for primarily wealth, land and power. So this brings your "greater inbreeding within royality than there is the general population as a whole" theory into question.

But I defer to your knowledge on the subject as I have yet to learn everything.

minds_I

PS...the Squeal like pig thing was ajoke...Deliverance
 

SkareCrow

Member
The euro royal familys are nasty. Inbred as fuck. Most of them were inbred out of existance.


Anyone ever see the paintings of Charles the 2nd of spain WTF!!!
 

SkareCrow

Member
wasnt his cousin his grandmother or somthing like that

they say his tounge was so large you could not understand him and that his nose actually came down to his chin wtf
 

madrecinco

Active member
Veteran
Hello all,

Well, Madrecinco, I was going to let it go til I read the above response and took it upon myself to do a little googling as you suggested.

As I only have a passing interest on this subject, I just read wiki. Yes, wiki is not an oracle of wisdom to be sure so take it with a grain of salt. Also, check the references (Library of Congress online)

"....NAH not true at all dear. Many royalty married first cousins as well as a modern day Italian American that ran for president Guiliani married HIS 1st cousin.....Einstien many notable ppl.
Lots of european royalty did marry 1st cousins...."

It is true that royality practiced incest as you say for the purpose of consolidating power, wealth and/or bloodline.

So, with this said... it is clear (from what little I have read on the subject) that incest with first cousins and further distant cousins is acceptable in many cultures and is more widely practiced and for primarily wealth, land and power. So this brings your "greater inbreeding within royality than there is the general population as a whole" theory into question.

But I defer to your knowledge on the subject as I have yet to learn everything.

minds_I

PS...the Squeal like pig thing was ajoke...Deliverance

I knew what the sqeal like a pig meant I have heard that lame line many times as a southerner and it is OFFENSIVE to me and OTHER southerners HERE who quietly put up with that CRAP! but I am sure you don't care. I use wiki for quick reference but read much on history since I retired especially.

I would reccommend you WIKI some CULTURAL SENSITIVITY IMHO!

but I don't really care to get into culture bashing with you as I consider myself a citizen of the world. MOST AMERICANS background is EUROPE and it is MY HISTORY ALSO being a descendant from there. I was JUST TRYING TO MAKE A POINT dear that RURAL AMERICANS DON'T FUCK COUSINS or sqeal like pigs like DELIVERANCE depicted....Hell even the STAR OF THAT MOVIE live down here south in JUPITER.


So I started this thread because I have a passion for reading history AND NONE OF US KNOW IT ALL. And we had sorta hijacked a thread so I started this one to gain more knowledge from others who read.

But I did not start it for CULTURE BASHIING....but if you feel you must.....I as an old southerner REALIZE that ignorance will go on as there are a lot of PPL LIKE YOU OUT THERE!

But I have the courage AND BALLS to stand up for my PPL.

But I love all cultures and myself feel cultural differences is OK!
 

madrecinco

Active member
Veteran
Charles was weird and POWERFUL and kept Henry from divorcing Katherine.

Eliabeth the Virgin Queen was declared a bastard for a while.

Elizabeth and Bloody Mary were just Catholic and Protestant pawns and used for a church war really. The churches controled royalty and europe. Charles was betrothed to Bloody Mary once and they were cousins. But she married another cousin Prince Phillip of Spain. Thankfully no children were born. But lots of deformities...mental retardation, Whack jobs.....Mad Juana was Queen Isabellas daughter and Mad Juana was CharlesV mother.

So many are related it is hard to keep up in my reading and connect the dots.
 

madrecinco

Active member
Veteran
how did a german babe end up sitting the throne of england anyhow?

Lots of British Royalty married German princesses,,,,,,also lots of Russians czars married German princesses.

The LAST CZAR was married to a German princess and she was also Queen Victorias grandaughter. The Kaiser in Germany was related to English royalty. The last czar in Russia Nicholas looks just like the Kaiser and also resembles Edward who abdicated the throne to marry an American divorcee,,,,,WALLIS must have had some good vijayjay to get a guy to give up his crown for her.

Those 3 guys look like triplets but one was German....Russian...English and all cousins from intermarraige. You are a dumbass if you don't see this in your history reading.
 

Latest posts

Latest posts

Top