TooNormal
Member
All,
I'm surprised this hasn't made NC NORML's news page yet, but NC State Rep. Earl Jones, (D-Guilford) has introduced the North Carolina Medical Marijuana Act.
Interesting notes: Rather than plant-count they are proposing 100 Square feet of "green canopy" as the limits - not sure it's unique but I've not seen this used before while looking at other MMJ states. Of course this means you can grow 25 clones + your more mature plants and still stay under limits.
I also noted the inclusion of a section on "...nor shall the person be subject to disciplinary action by a business or occupation or professional licensing board or bureau..." to counteract the improper interpretation of the section on "An employer [is not required] to accommodate the medical use of marijuana in any workplace."
I believe I saw a post (here?) on an MMJ patient recently filing a lawsuit after being fired due to a positive drug test, and the employer using the "workplace is not required to accommodate" clause as their right to fire. So maybe this is a possible application of lessons learned there - perhaps the congress-critters aren't all bad.
If you live in NC please contact your state representatives to support this bill.
Looks like there's a link on NCCPN http://www.nccpn.org/ to find your local representatives.
Bill Details from the NC State Legislature pages HERE:
=================================
TooNormal
I'm surprised this hasn't made NC NORML's news page yet, but NC State Rep. Earl Jones, (D-Guilford) has introduced the North Carolina Medical Marijuana Act.
Interesting notes: Rather than plant-count they are proposing 100 Square feet of "green canopy" as the limits - not sure it's unique but I've not seen this used before while looking at other MMJ states. Of course this means you can grow 25 clones + your more mature plants and still stay under limits.
I also noted the inclusion of a section on "...nor shall the person be subject to disciplinary action by a business or occupation or professional licensing board or bureau..." to counteract the improper interpretation of the section on "An employer [is not required] to accommodate the medical use of marijuana in any workplace."
I believe I saw a post (here?) on an MMJ patient recently filing a lawsuit after being fired due to a positive drug test, and the employer using the "workplace is not required to accommodate" clause as their right to fire. So maybe this is a possible application of lessons learned there - perhaps the congress-critters aren't all bad.
If you live in NC please contact your state representatives to support this bill.
Looks like there's a link on NCCPN http://www.nccpn.org/ to find your local representatives.
Bill Details from the NC State Legislature pages HERE:
=================================
TooNormal