Tarantula-1
Member
Thought for a minute this might belong in the Cannabis Laws section but as it doesn't address any specific laws, I'm putting it here. (My apologies if it doesn't belong.)
I often have the argument with nonsmokers that 90% or better of all the supposed negatives associated with reeefer are a direct result of its legal (or rather, illegal) status. This runs the gamut from health issues to crime issues and all points between.
What I'd like to open for discussion here is the question relating mostly to sativas: that is, anxiety and paranoia associated with some sativa strains.
Bluntly put: do sativas actually create states of paranoia and anxiety in certain smokers? Or is this common complaint also a byproduct of draconian cannabis laws? - does the reality of the potential for being found out, raided, busted, court and jail time, stash and asset seizure, etc - which is a reality that's always there, whether or not foremost in our minds - warp the head-high experience of smoking pure or near-pure sativas?
I guess the question I'm asking is - in a perfect scenario (personal use/grows 100% entirely legal) do you believe there would be anxiety issues related to sativas (as media horror stories always emphasize)? Would there be any negatives to the soaring/speeding high, or would instead, sativas be viewed as gateways to a blissful, transcendent (thus safely theraputic) mental state?
And are we, as cannabis enthusists, so used to the buzzkill of medieval criminal and social penalties to the herb that we fail to take it into account? The reason I ask is because, in the 1970s with decrimininalization becoming reality - and legalization seemingly around the corner - I almost never encountered paranoia freakout stories and scenarios associated with weed, much of which at that time was sativa weed....but post-Reagan, in the war on drugs era, as society keeps moving backwards on decrim/legalizing...? More and more people are finding what should be the most brilliant effects of the cannabis experience to be the most worrisome/negative.
Am I nuts here - or onto something?
I often have the argument with nonsmokers that 90% or better of all the supposed negatives associated with reeefer are a direct result of its legal (or rather, illegal) status. This runs the gamut from health issues to crime issues and all points between.
What I'd like to open for discussion here is the question relating mostly to sativas: that is, anxiety and paranoia associated with some sativa strains.
Bluntly put: do sativas actually create states of paranoia and anxiety in certain smokers? Or is this common complaint also a byproduct of draconian cannabis laws? - does the reality of the potential for being found out, raided, busted, court and jail time, stash and asset seizure, etc - which is a reality that's always there, whether or not foremost in our minds - warp the head-high experience of smoking pure or near-pure sativas?
I guess the question I'm asking is - in a perfect scenario (personal use/grows 100% entirely legal) do you believe there would be anxiety issues related to sativas (as media horror stories always emphasize)? Would there be any negatives to the soaring/speeding high, or would instead, sativas be viewed as gateways to a blissful, transcendent (thus safely theraputic) mental state?
And are we, as cannabis enthusists, so used to the buzzkill of medieval criminal and social penalties to the herb that we fail to take it into account? The reason I ask is because, in the 1970s with decrimininalization becoming reality - and legalization seemingly around the corner - I almost never encountered paranoia freakout stories and scenarios associated with weed, much of which at that time was sativa weed....but post-Reagan, in the war on drugs era, as society keeps moving backwards on decrim/legalizing...? More and more people are finding what should be the most brilliant effects of the cannabis experience to be the most worrisome/negative.
Am I nuts here - or onto something?
Last edited: