Sid The Kid
New member
IN THE eyes of international law, there is only one way to deal with cannabis: ban it. The 186 governments signed up to the 1961 convention on drugs are required to do just that. The results are unimpressive (see "Recreational cannabis: time to ease the ban?"). Some 166 million people worldwide use cannabis, many of them in countries with the most punitive anti-cannabis regimes. These people are not only at risk from the drug's health ill effects, but also of harm from arrest, punishment and the stigma of a criminal record.
An alternative will be advanced at a UN meeting in March: decriminalise the drug, and let governments produce and sell it. This way less potent strains would be encouraged, and sale to teenagers - who are at greatest risk - banned. Today's illegal suppliers would be marginalised and resources would be freed to fight more damaging drugs.
This appeal is unlikely to be taken up by politicians terrified of appearing "soft on drugs". But if they really want to reduce the harm cannabis can do, isn't it time they took their cue from the evidence, not public prejudice?
Original Article