Minion said:Hey I just bought these, which are better? Will these even work?
Minion said:Sweet!!! I'm not a hard core smoker and just kind of grow for myself and friends. I'm glad to know I'm on my way! I actually was wondering about the less-is-more thing while I was shopping. Oh well, I'll keep that in mind for future purchases.
Hydro-Soil said:If you look at your bulbs you'll see that they actually only use 23-26 watts. You're just fine with those The 60 and 100w labels you see are the wattage incandescent bulb they're designed to "replace". (Sheeple Marketing Tactic)
Tanuvan said:The 55W PL-L lamps are certainly efficient, but difficult to replace at the local hardware store if they burn out. CFL spirals are pretty much everywhere.
Tanuvan said:How many inches are the bulbs including the socket?
Tanuvan said:The PL-L lamps. I am wondering if they will fit in a cab that is 23.5 inches wide with the sockets.
tejashidrow said:Hey Hydro-soil...
I was kinda wondering about the HIGHER WATT to efficency ratio of cfl.
I was doing a "i just wonder what will happen" experiment in my fresh built micro v-scrog. I had two 65 watt cfls and then two 42 watt cfls (total 4 cfl) in a row.
The bud under the 2 65's just were nothing when compared to the bud under the 2 42's. My next run will be ALL four will be 42's. While my TOTAL watts will drop (from 214 to 168) i feel the effeincy will go up... THANKS for the info!!! pax
HeftCinch said:Minion, you caught my eye with those bulbs before, can you tell me about the ballast. I'm assuming it's a remote ballast, do you wire the sockets directly to the ballast. I want to have the remote long tubes like yours for better heat control and directional lighting.
HeftCinch said:I want to have the remote long tubes like yours for better heat control and directional lighting.