He just wants to say that you weight is less that what DrBud says we can get if done correctly... I think you did a great job and sorry for the bickering in your thread it just gets old
Krakatoa said:.
2. Encouraging people to grow micro-SOG is irresponsible, because this method involves having enough plants to send you to prison for many, many years. Plant count is what matters to LEO, not weight. Mini-SOG is only for those who are willing to risk serious prison time.
Clowntown isn't hating, and neither am I. I'm just observing reality.
NanoScroger said:a pocket full of weed that never runs out, or going to a party and smokin everyone out and never worrying about running out or how much you went through is the true measure of success. ........
as long as you are growing that one hitter quitter, and staying blazed, fuck it. i say you are a raging success.
Apparently the weight is inconsequential only when you fail, which to my knowledge, every single person trying this has ... and also will. But I'll bet you'd be posting those weights in a heartbeat if you succeeded in a decent harvest number, though, just to "prove" that you were able to. I mean if you're doing something with a set goal of yield, and fail in the yield, why does it suddenly not matter?greenatik said:these are personal grows for personal smoke, weight is inconsequential.
Yeah, never seen a HPS in my life.NanoScroger said:all these haters caught up in weight and shit. eh whatever. internet growers. probably never even seen an hps before in there lives. caught up in the i wanna be a commercial grower/baller/be on mtv cribs type
greenfarmer said:are you using UVB lights at all?