What's new

Federal war on medical pot challenged

quadracer

Active member
Digitalhippy,

Do you remember when there wasn't a "SB420?" Cops arrested a lot of people who were well within the legal limits. SB420 isn't perfect, but at least it established some sort of guidelines to protect patients. SB420 made it so the cops could only weigh the dry flower, and not the entire plant with rootball included. SB420 made it legal to transport medicine in your car, and legal for extracts...

If the courts cancel out SB420, I fear more prosecution of medical patients that shouldn't be prosecuted.
 

inflorescence

Active member
Veteran
DIGITALHIPPY said:
DUDE !! WHAT!!! hypicrit?? SB420 IS BAD!!!! BAD BAD BAD!!!
its not even LEGAL!!! you CANNOT AMEND A PROPOSITION!!!!!

besides sb420 makes most of us here criminals, 6 mature plants max. bs, no one tells the pharm how much oxy to give out.

I'm gonna make YOU do the work on this one.
Post the entire SB420 and go thru each line item.
Each one of those items not specifically addressed by 215, which is PRETTY MUCH EVERY ONE, will become void if SB420 is declared unconstitutional.

Let the list begin:
 

kmk420kali

Freedom Fighter
Veteran
inflorescence said:
I'm gonna make YOU do the work on this one.
Post the entire SB420 and go thru each line item.
Each one of those items not specifically addressed by 215, which is PRETTY MUCH EVERY ONE, will become void if SB420 is declared unconstitutional.

Let the list begin:

SB420 was not found unconstitutional-- It is ok to amend a Proposition...but in limiting the plant count, it was undermining what was written in Prop 215--
You can add-to, but not put limitation-on--
Don't you think they would have picked up on that, and ran with it...if your scenario was the case??
 

inflorescence

Active member
Veteran
The question before the court wasn't whether an amendment that limited a proposition was constituional or not it was simply whether a legislature can ever amend any proposition.

Believe me, they picked up on it and they will run with it once the supreme court rules in their favor.
I think they are just using the plant limits as kind of a test.
 

kmk420kali

Freedom Fighter
Veteran
inflorescence said:
The question before the court wasn't whether an amendment that limited a proposition was constituional or not it was simply whether a legislature can ever amend any proposition.

Believe me, they picked up on it and they will run with it once the supreme court rules in their favor.
I think they are just using the plant limits as kind of a test.

Seems it has been amended...http://www.icmag.com/ic/showthread.php?t=97550
 

inflorescence

Active member
Veteran
kmk420kali said:

Nah (it's on appeal). Jerry is just pre-emptively issuing these guidelines to bolster his appeals case.
IF the supreme court rules that 215 cannot be amended then why do you think they would allow the AG to amend 215. Afterall, Jerry is a member of the legislature and the circuit court said the legislature could NOT amend 215.

Jerry is just getting his say in before he is shut down by a higher authority (ie. the supreme court).
 
Last edited:

kmk420kali

Freedom Fighter
Veteran
inflorescence said:
Nah (it's on appeal). Jerry is just pre-emptively issuing these guidelines to bolster his appeals case.
IF the supreme court rules that 215 cannot be amended then why do you think they would allow the AG to amend 215. Afterall, Jerry is a member of the legislature and the circuit court said the legislature could NOT amend 215.

Jerry is just getting his say in before he is shut down by a higher authority (ie. the supreme court).

At least you found out it is not, "Gerry"-- :muahaha:
(We'll see bro--) :joint:
 
Top