What's new

The Latest Marijuana Propaganda Campaign

vta

Active member
Veteran
USA -- Flipping through the channels, a man in a pith helmet and a white mustache flashes onto the screen, asking you to join him in his hunt for the “mature stoner.” It is yet another anti-drug commercial in the government-sponsored ad campaign “Above the Influence.” Filled with propaganda and falsified information, the series of four commercials chronicles the adventures of “Dr. Puck” and his assistant, Baldric. They watch “stoners” in their natural habitat: relaxing, going to school, and even driving. This series of ads perpetuates many of the myths associated with marijuana use.

The first commercial opens with a monologue from the doctor while standing on a suburban street. The good doctor prepares us to hunt the “remarkably unmotivated” stoners who are cloistered in a smoke filled basement. Strewn about the pair of stoners are food wrappers and empty bottles, and the two are mesmerized by the television. Apparently marijuana makes you not notice two complete strangers lurking behind the potted plants in your house.
According to Above the Influence, marijuana makes people so oblivious to their surroundings that Baldric is able to place a tracking collar on one of the stoners without being noticed. After the collar is installed, the two researchers retire to their surveillance van where you find out that marijuana makes you sit on a couch for three days without moving to, you know, go to the bathroom, shower, see family members, etc.

Dr. Puck then decides to observe the female stoner in a social situation. A boy walks up to the female stoner and initiates a little flirting, but the female stoner can’t remember his name or the flow of conversation. She is constantly embarrassed as the simple social interaction is bungled, and then her questionable hygiene is revealed when the boy notices a chunk of brownie in her hair. The doctor feels that marijuana-users lack the motivation to keep chunks of random food out of their hair.

In the next commercial, the Doctor and Baldric have managed to re-create the stoners’ natural habitat in a lab environment. The brave assistant, clad in cover-alls and a gas mask, enters the smoke-filled chamber and puts the stoners through a series of tests. Baldric proceeds to test the stoner’s reflexes by throwing different objects at the young man and he makes no attempt to catch any of them. The doctor decides to move onto trials to test the young girl’s concentration. Baldric engages in a game of blackjack with the young girl who tells him to “go fish.” Obviously, marijuana-users cannot handle the simplest of tasks, but can they drive a car? That’s what the doctor tries to prove, and apparently the answer is no. The stoner drives like someone 20 beers deep, crashing into different obstacles and leaving the obstacle course in ruins.

This newest batch of propaganda ads is reverting back to the lies of the 1930s. Although it cites many sources to bolster its points, most of the sources are from the National Institute of Drug Abuse (NIDA) a government funded research institute. NIDA controls the growth and distribution of all medical-grade marijuana in the United States, and they have been known to be very stingy, not allowing marijuana to be given to studies that contradict their findings. NIDA’s stated mission is to “lead the Nation in bringing the power of science to bear on drug abuse and addiction.” This mission would obviously tend to favor the negative aspects of marijuana rather than any potential benefits.

Dr. Puck and his assistant perpetuate the many myths and assumptions that surround marijuana users. Bad hygiene, slurred speech, shortened memory span, and decreased awareness of surroundings are all effects taken straight out of the NIDA pamphlet, even though there has never been solid proof that marijuana negatively affects the brain. These campaigns are often weak and ineffective, providing nothing more than TV fodder for stoned teenagers. In 2005, a survey company named Westat was hired to do a comprehensive study on the effectiveness of the “Above the Influence” campaign. The study concluded that the ads had a negative affect because “greater exposure to the ad campaign was associated with weaker anti-drug norms and increases in perception that others use marijuana.”Government funded ad campaigns take about a half a billion dollars of the tax payers’ money each year. The government is wasting its time and money to stop people from using the most popular and widely used recreational drug. Marijuana use has not declined over time. In fact, studies have shown that is the drug with the fastest growing user base.

Obviously, the government’s tactics are not working, and it is time that our legislators took a new stance on marijuana

http://cannabisnews.com/news/23/thread23859.shtml
 

Binnacas

Member
Thanks, vta for the post. It's amusing to see how desperate the goverment is in this matter. Those commercials seem like jokes more than propaganda to me, though I haven't seen 'em. Can't believe they're still using the old "facts" they come up with decades ago, it's rediculous.
 

SmokeyPufmaster

Active member
Veteran
Gov't would rather waste your money on nonsense, than try to save your home. The asshats are truly backwards on many such things.
 

entropical

Active member
Veteran
Stating that these types of propaganda campaigns are ineffective is dead wrong. To even reach such a conclusion, you would have to assume that it actually is directed towards youths as a deterrent against drug abuse. They might claim it, but statement and actuality are not always one and the same in politics. Propaganda is a technique used in psychological warfare, in this case by a regime waging war on drug users. If these propaganda techniques where not effective, they would simply not be used.

This is typical stereotyping hate-propaganda. It is not intended to stop drug use. It is intended to create hatred against drug users in a target audience. It is adressed to those who are already sympathetic to the agenda, but also those who have fallen in doubt and are in need of reinforcing their beliefs. Another potential target audience is found among those of us who have not yet developed a sense of critical thinking - namely, children. If hatred based on false images is imprinted at an early age, the more likely it can be reinforced by further propaganda.

To say that the Government is desperate in this matter is a joke. Thats like saying we are the ones that have them on the run, when in fact they are the ones hunting us down like stray animals and throwing us in cages. Dont fool yourselves into believing that what happened in Nazi-Germany before and during WWII cant happen again when its happening right before your very eyes.
 
Last edited:

Binnacas

Member
entropical, you do have a very good point there. It's as easy for a child or an anti-drug grown-up to see these commercials as something based on facts as it is for us to believe everything negative said about marijuana propaganda on this site.

You can't depend on your eyes when your imagination is out of focus. - Mark Twain
 

entropical

Active member
Veteran
I remember, at 13yrs just started getting into drinking and saying to myself - alcohol is kool man, but drugs are bad mmkay.. Ill never, EVEr touch em in my life!! Sure am glad I woke up from that one..

:smoweed:
 
Last edited:
Top