no, wrong. PEOPLE are inherently dangerous, which is why many OTHER people buy a firearm for protection. you can't fix stupid...Does cannabis impair judgment so much so that firearms should probably not be owned by those who regularly partake?
Yes, when it comes to handguns at least, I happen to agree with that. Mind you, I happen to have the same view about people whose strongest drink is black coffee.
Does alcohol impair the judgment so much that firearms should not be owned by those who regularly drink alcohol?
YES. Emphatically yes. FAR more so than with cannabis.
So why isn't the federal government doing that? Because alcohol is legal and cannabis isn't. 100 years ago, alcohol was, too - but you went down that road and it didn't work out.
"Gee: It's almost as if handguns are inherently dangerous and should only be owned by people who's job requires it."
Yes. Right.