What's going to be really fun is when the SC overturns Roe v Wade, it eliminates the "right to privacy", which Judge Alito claims doesn't exist in the Constitution...
It centers around the 14th Amendment due process clause which was argued in 1973 that this gave someone a 'right to privacy'. In Alito's draft he talks about 'enumerated rights' of which the 'right to privacy' is not anywhere in the constitution. Some constitutional scholars argue that the reason we don't have a gun registry or that you don't have to register all your guns with the government is explicitly due to the rulings in RvW and this precedent of 'right to privacy'...this has been argued multiple times in courts, where gun advocates argue the 14th Amendment due process clause is the 'right to privacy' and why it's never been ruled in favor of any sort of gun registry. Overturning RvW is more about the interpretation of the 14th Amendment and this 'right to privacy' then abortion. It is the same exact arguments that exist in the Planned Parenthood vs. Casey decision...
So again...maybe these GOP folks want to think twice about what could happen if RvW is overturned, really meaning the idea of 'right to privacy' goes away. RvW and PP v Casey are the ONLY supreme court cases where this precedent of 'right to privacy' exist...