What's new
  • Happy Birthday ICMag! Been 20 years since Gypsy Nirvana created the forum! We are celebrating with a 4/20 Giveaway and by launching a new Patreon tier called "420club". You can read more here.
  • Important notice: ICMag's T.O.U. has been updated. Please review it here. For your convenience, it is also available in the main forum menu, under 'Quick Links"!

Covid 19 mrna Vaccines...Yes/No?

Covid 19 mrna Vaccines...Yes/No?

  • yes, gimme

    Votes: 29 31.9%
  • not yet

    Votes: 15 16.5%
  • no way

    Votes: 47 51.6%

  • Total voters
    91
  • Poll closed .

mexcurandero420

See the world through a puff of smoke
Veteran
Screenshot_20211027-000454_Chrome~2.jpg
wAAACH5BAEKAAAALAAAAAABAAEAAAICRAEAOw==
​ Hopefully you have enough in stock and a bucket with gold.
 

flylowgethigh

Non-growing Lurker
ICMag Donor
Fed.guv is buying radio ads saying the jabs are safe for children. Damn feds are coming out with how safe the jab is for kids 5-11, and they are already saying it is safe and effective for older hids.

They are monsters. All of the med mafia are just a bunch of monsters.
 

Hammerhead

Disabled Farmer
ICMag Donor
Veteran
LMAO, If it was the Rep pushing it you all would be fine with it. Vacine bad since the Dems are in fav of it.
 

Absolem

Active member
Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/art...__ffn_sectitle

Hate to break it to you but this study was done using a petri dish. Not on human subjects.

Pretty clear you only read the headline before posting this. You even got three likes for that post. Three more people who didn't take the time to read what you posted. Pretty sad.


"In order to investigate if chloroquine might prevent SARS-CoV infection, permissive Vero E6 cells [1] were pretreated with various concentrations of chloroquine (0.1–10 μM) for 20–24 h prior to virus infection. Cells were then infected with SARS-CoV, and virus antigens were visualized by indirect immunofluorescence as described in Materials and Methods. Microscopic examination (Fig. ​(Fig.1A)1A) of the control cells (untreated, infected) revealed extensive SARS-CoV-specific immunostaining of the monolayer."
 

mexcurandero420

See the world through a puff of smoke
Veteran
Hate to break it to you but this study was done using a petri dish. Not on human subjects.

Pretty clear you only read the headline before posting this. You even got three likes for that post. Three more people who didn't take the time to read what you posted. Pretty sad.


"In order to investigate if chloroquine might prevent SARS-CoV infection, permissive Vero E6 cells [1] were pretreated with various concentrations of chloroquine (0.1–10 μM) for 20–24 h prior to virus infection. Cells were then infected with SARS-CoV, and virus antigens were visualized by indirect immunofluorescence as described in Materials and Methods. Microscopic examination (Fig. ​(Fig.1A)1A) of the control cells (untreated, infected) revealed extensive SARS-CoV-specific immunostaining of the monolayer."

Well in an interview in early of the pandemic 2020 a Dutch virologist who did also research to MERS which was send a sample to him after discovery in the Middle East, he said;

The major problem with new medicines is that they have to go through a very long process because of safety. You want to make sure that such a remedy is safe and not worse than the disease. And that just takes half a year.
As for chloroquine, there is a certain efficacy, but whether that is enough to use it on a large scale remains to be seen. If that were the case, you can't say overnight that we now need chloroquine for a hundred times as many patients."

In a lecture about SARS-CoV he showed the research above about chloroquine.
Btw chloroquine is used since the 1940s, so enough info about safety.
 

h.h.

Active member
Veteran
Well in an interview in early of the pandemic 2020 a Dutch virologist who did also research to MERS which was send a sample to him after discovery in the Middle East, he said;

The major problem with new medicines is that they have to go through a very long process because of safety. You want to make sure that such a remedy is safe and not worse than the disease. And that just takes half a year.
As for chloroquine, there is a certain efficacy, but whether that is enough to use it on a large scale remains to be seen. If that were the case, you can't say overnight that we now need chloroquine for a hundred times as many patients."

In a lecture about SARS-CoV he showed the research above about chloroquine.
Btw chloroquine is used since the 1940s, so enough info about safety.

It’s been over a half a year for the vaccines.

Chloroquine And ivermectin have been used safely for years and they may find their place in the treatment of some Covid cases. At this point, we simply don’t know. Hopefully in a few years, the vaccine, maybe all vaccines can be replaced with a simpler medication or even better by changes in our habits. Hopefully there is a better path. Time will tell.
For today. For right now. The vaccines are saving lives.
 

mexcurandero420

See the world through a puff of smoke
Veteran
It’s been over a half a year for the vaccines.

Chloroquine And ivermectin have been used safely for years and they may find their place in the treatment of some Covid cases. At this point, we simply don’t know. Hopefully in a few years, the vaccine, maybe all vaccines can be replaced with a simpler medication or even better by changes in our habits. Hopefully there is a better path. Time will tell.
For today. For right now. The vaccines are saving lives.

You think so saving lives?

Screenshot_20211028-171909_Chrome~2.jpg
 

imiubu

Well-known member
Nope, still... NOPE.
My body, my choice, NO jab.

On a side note, "they" are so desperate here that they are now going door to door shoving dried blood red
notices in peoples doors/ door handles announcing a free vaccine event at the local church. Stay off my porch ffs.
Who decided that particular color for this endeavor would be a good choice? :chin:
 

Latest posts

Latest posts

Top