What's new
  • Happy Birthday ICMag! Been 20 years since Gypsy Nirvana created the forum! We are celebrating with a 4/20 Giveaway and by launching a new Patreon tier called "420club". You can read more here.
  • Important notice: ICMag's T.O.U. has been updated. Please review it here. For your convenience, it is also available in the main forum menu, under 'Quick Links"!

Have you looked at the North Pole lately?

White Beard

Active member
I’ve seen fucking EVERYTHING now....

Trichrider, buddy, do you realize you’ve switched sides with these last two posts????
 

igrowone

Well-known member
Veteran
hot off the wire, which describes the situation quite well
in short, September 2020, hottest September in the record book
matches arctic conditions very well

Monthly Temperature: September 2020

During September 2020, warmer-than-average temperatures were present across much of the globe. Temperature departures of +1.5°C (+2.7°F) or higher were observed across parts of the North Pacific Ocean, western parts of Canada and the U.S., the North Atlantic Ocean, South America, Europe, Asia, Australia, and Antarctica. Record-warm September temperatures departures were present across the Middle East and Mediterranean Sea, northern and southern parts of Asia, Kara Sea, the north and western Pacific Ocean, Indian Ocean, northwestern Australia, as well as parts of South America and the western contiguous U.S. Overall, about 8.49% of the world's land and ocean surfaces had a record-warm September temperature. This was the second highest September percentage since records began in 1951, behind September 2015. Cooler-than-average conditions were limited to parts of Greenland and adjacent portions of the North Atlantic Ocean, eastern Canada, the eastern U.S., the tropical eastern and central Pacific Ocean, the southern Indian Ocean, and the western part of Asia and northern Africa. However, no land or ocean areas had record-cold September temperatures.
Regionally, Europe had its warmest September with a temperature departure of +2.33°C (+4.19°F), exceeding the now second warmest September set in 2015, 2017, and 2018 by 0.22°C (0.40°F). Europe's five warmest Septembers have occurred since 2006. Meanwhile, South America, Asia, and Oceania had their second-warmest September since regional records began in 1910.

September 2020 Blended Land and Sea Surface
Temperature Anomalies in degrees Celsius


September 2020 Blended Land and Sea Surface
Temperature Percentiles

Averaged as a whole, the September 2020 global land and ocean surface temperature was the highest for September in the 141-year record at 0.97°C (1.75°F) above the 20th century average of 15.0°C (59.0°F). This value surpassed the previous record set in 2015 and, again in 2016, by only 0.02°C (0.04°F). The month of September 2020 marked the 44th consecutive September and the 429th consecutive month with temperatures, at least nominally, above the 20th century average. The ten warmest Septembers have occurred since 2005, while the seven warmest Septembers have occurred in the last seven years (2014–2020).
 

TychoMonolyth

Boreal Curing
Inside Venice's bid to hold back the tide
https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2015/jun/16/inside-venice-bid-hold-back-tide-sea-level-rise

Venice-lagoon-1-1100x200.png


TELEMMGLPICT000216293539_trans_NvBQzQNjv4BqpVlberWd9EgFPZtcLiMQfy2dmClwgbjjulYfPTELibA.jpeg
 

trichrider

Kiss My Ring
Veteran
Biggest CO2 drop: Real-time data shows Covid-19’s massive impact on global emissions



10/14/2020 - While the ongoing Corona pandemic continues to threaten millions of lives around the world, the first half of 2020 saw an unprecedented decline in CO2 emissions – larger than during the financial crisis of 2008, the oil crisis of 1979, or even World War II. An international team of researchers has found that in the first six months of this year, 8.8 percent less carbon dioxide were emitted than in the same period in 2019 – a total decrease of 1551 million tonnes. The groundbreaking study not only offers a much more precise look at COVID-19’s impact on global energy consumption than previous analyses. It also suggests what fundamental steps could be taken to stabilize the global climate in the aftermath of the pandemic.
33c8da2a-5129-4c80-aea7-42ab86acb87c.jpeg
Empty streets in Belfast, Northern Ireland during the lockdown (Photo: K. Mitch Hodge/Unsplash) “What makes our study unique is the analysis of meticulously collected near-real-time data,” explains lead author Zhu Liu from the Department of Earth System Science at Tsinghua University in Beijing. “By looking at the daily figures compiled by the Carbon Monitor research initiative we were able to get a much faster and more accurate overview, including timelines that show how emissions decreases have corresponded to lockdown measures in each country. In April, at the height of the first wave of Corona infections, when most major countries shut down their public life and parts of their economy, emissions even declined by 16.9%. Overall, the various outbreaks resulted in emission drops that we normally see only on a short-term basis on holidays such as Christmas or the Chinese Spring Festival.”
An in-depth look at different economic sectors

The study, published in the latest issue of Nature Communications, shows which parts of the global economy were most impacted. “The greatest reduction of emissions was observed in the ground transportation sector,” explains Daniel Kammen, professor and Chair of the Energy and Resources Group and also professor in the Goldman School of Public Policy, University of California, Berkeley. “Largely because of working from home restrictions, transport CO2 emissions decreased by 40% worldwide. In contrast, the power and industry sectors contributed less to the decline, with -22% and -17%, respectively, as did the aviation and shipping sectors. Surprisingly, even the residential sector saw a small emissions drop of 3%: largely because of an abnormally warm winter in the northern hemisphere, heating energy consumption decreased with most people staying at home all day during lockdown periods.”

To paint this comprehensive and multidimensional picture, the researchers based their estimates on the widest array of data possible: precise, hourly datasets of electricity power production in 31 countries, daily vehicle traffic in more than 400 cities worldwide, daily global passenger flights, monthly production data for industry in 62 countries as well as fuel consumption data for building emissions in more than 200 countries.
"We need structural and transformational changes"

The researchers also found strong rebound effects. With the exception of a continuing decrease of emissions stemming from the transportation sector, by July 2020, as soon as lockdown measures were lifted, most economies resumed their usual levels of emitting CO2. But even if they remained at their historically low levels, this would have a rather minuscule effect on the long-term CO2 concentration in the atmosphere.

Thus, the authors stress that the only valid strategy to stabilize the climate is a complete overhaul of the industry and commerce sector. “While the CO2 drop is unprecedented, decreases of human activities cannot be the answer,” says co-author Hans Joachim Schellnhuber, founding director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research. “Instead we need structural and transformational changes in our energy production and consumption systems. Individual behavior is certainly important, but what we really need to focus on is reducing the carbon intensity of our global economy.”
https://www.pik-potsdam.de/en/news/...id-192019s-massive-impact-on-global-emissions
 

igrowone

Well-known member
Veteran
good evening gents
time for update because the arctic conditions are noteworthy
in short we've been in significant record lows for the last couple of weeks
the last record lows were last year in 2019, back to back
so it's getting to be a pattern, ice just doesn't build as quickly as it did
 

Attachments

  • N_daily_extent.jpg
    N_daily_extent.jpg
    30.6 KB · Views: 23
  • N_iqr_timeseries.jpg
    N_iqr_timeseries.jpg
    54.1 KB · Views: 26

trichrider

Kiss My Ring
Veteran
Coupling of the subpolar gyre and the overturning circulation during abrupt glacial climate transitions

M. Klockmann
U. Mikolajewicz
H. Kleppin
J. Marotzke

First published: 22 October 2020
https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL090361

Abstract

We present a mechanism for self?sustained ocean circulation changes that cause abrupt temperature changes over Greenland in a multi?millennial climate model simulation with glacial CO2 concentrations representative of Marine Isotope Stage 3. The Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC) and the subpolar gyre (SPG) oscillate on millennial timescales. When the AMOC is strong, the SPG is weak and contracted; when the AMOC is weak, the SPG is strong and extensive. The coupling between the two systems via wind?driven and density?driven feedbacks is key to maintaining the oscillations. The SPG controls the transport of heat and salt into the deep?water formation sites and thus controls the AMOC strength. The strength and location of the deep?water formation affect the density?driven part of the SPG and thus control the mean strength and extent of the SPG. This mechanism supports the hypothesis that coupled ocean?ice?atmosphere interactions could have triggered abrupt glacial climate change.

Plain Language Summary

Between 57.000 and 29.000 years ago, the last glacial period was marked by several abrupt warming and cooling events over Greenland and the North Atlantic. Understanding the mechanism behind these so?called Dansgaard?Oeschger events increases our understanding of possible tipping points that cause abrupt change in the earth system. The role of the ocean in causing these events is still a topic of debate. We _nd abrupt changes in the North Atlantic circulation that resemble Dansgaard?Oeschger events in a simulation with a state?of?the?art climate model. These simulated ocean circulation changes are generated without adding external triggers such as meltwater from glaciers. Instead, the events are generated by the interaction of the the two large?scale current systems in the North Atlantic {the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC) and the North Atlantic subpolar gyre (SPG). Both current systems are affected by changes in surface winds and the density pattern of the North Atlantic. We find that the location where the densest water is formed controls how the SPG interacts with the AMOC. Under favorable conditions, the effects of wind and density combine in such a way that changes in the SPG cause abrupt changes in the AMOC.

https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2020GL090361

A continuous pathway for fresh water along the East Greenland shelf

  1. View ORCID ProfileNicholas P. Foukal1,*,
  2. View ORCID ProfileRenske Gelderloos2 and
  3. View ORCID ProfileRobert S. Pickart1
Abstract

Export from the Arctic and meltwater from the Greenland Ice Sheet together form a southward-flowing coastal current along the East Greenland shelf. This current transports enough fresh water to substantially alter the large-scale circulation of the North Atlantic, yet the coastal current’s origin and fate are poorly known due to our lack of knowledge concerning its north-south connectivity. Here, we demonstrate how the current negotiates the complex topography of Denmark Strait using in situ data and output from an ocean circulation model. We determine that the coastal current north of the strait supplies half of the transport to the coastal current south of the strait, while the other half is sourced from offshore via the shelfbreak jet, with little input from the Greenland Ice Sheet. These results indicate that there is a continuous pathway for Arctic-sourced fresh water along the entire East Greenland shelf from Fram Strait to Cape Farewell.

INTRODUCTION

Along the continental shelf of East Greenland, fresh water near the coast and saltier water offshore create a cross-shelf density gradient that supports a southward-flowing coastal current (Fig. 1A). The current intensifies as it flows southward, reaching a maximum of about 2 Sverdrups (Sv; 1 Sv = 106 m3/s) near Cape Farewell (1). Despite its relatively small transport, the exceptionally fresh waters of the East Greenland Coastal Current (EGCC) make it a vital component of the large-scale circulation. Over 30% of the total oceanic freshwater transport between Greenland and Scotland is carried by the EGCC [referenced to the section mean salinity (2)], and it is an important component of the Arctic freshwater budget (1).




Fig. 1 Circulation of the East Greenland shelf.(A) Schematic circulation of the East Greenland shelf region. Bathymetry is shaded, and the 350- and 500-m isobaths are highlighted in black. The East Greenland Current (orange) flows southward at the shelfbreak along the entirety of East Greenland. The EGCC (pink) has been documented upstream of Denmark Strait and downstream of the Kangerdlugssuaq (KG) Trough, but its connection across Denmark Strait is unknown (dashed line). Other circulation features are shown in gray. The black dashed line outlines the region shown in (B). (B) Depth-integrated absolute geostrophic transports (see section S1) for water with salinity less than 34 from various hydrographic sections across Denmark Strait (year and cruise codes provided in legend). Bathymetric contours are shown every 25 m for 0 to 250 m, every 50 m for 250 to 500 m, and every 200 m deeper than 600 m. The 250-, 350-, 500-, and 1000-m isobaths are highlighted in black.


As the EGCC rounds Cape Farewell, a portion of the fresh water progresses northward along the west coast of Greenland, while the remainder is fluxed offshore into the interior of the subpolar gyre (1). The potential fate of this fresh water in regions of deep water formation has led many to speculate that the accelerating melting of the Greenland Ice Sheet (3, 4) will stratify the subpolar gyre, slow or stop the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) (57), and trigger nonlinear shifts in future climate sensitivity (8). However, the fresh water on the East Greenland shelf is also supplied by the Arctic via Fram Strait (9, 10), and the Arctic may play a larger role in setting the coastal current’s variability than the input from Greenland (11, 12). This distinction between the two source regions is particularly important because fresh water stored in the Beaufort Gyre may be released in pulses when the anticyclonic winds periodically weaken (13), whereas input from the Greenland Ice Sheet will likely increase more gradually. The existence of a continuous pathway for the EGCC from Fram Strait to Cape Farewell will determine whether both sources of fresh water will primarily affect deep-water formation in the Greenland and Iceland Seas or continue southward into the North Atlantic and affect convection in the subpolar gyre.


Direct observations of the EGCC are plentiful south of Denmark Strait (1, 2, 11, 1418), but the current’s evolution north of 66°N is poorly known. A series of observational and theoretical papers (17, 19) suggested that the EGCC could emerge from the interaction of the East Greenland Current with the deep Kangerdlugssuaq Trough. In this conceptual model, a net input of fresh water into the trough splits into the coastal current south of Denmark Strait and a return flow out of the trough. Although this model does not require a coastal current upstream of Denmark Strait, such a coastal current has been observed in the Nordic domain as far north as Fram Strait (20, 21), referred to as the Polar Surface Water Jet (21). This raises the question of whether the EGCC south of Denmark Strait is supplied by more northerly sources.


In this study, we use shipboard hydrographic data from multiple cruises, a high-resolution regional ocean circulation model, and historical surface drifters to address the connectivity of the coastal current across Denmark Strait. We find that while the coastal current does indeed connect across Denmark Strait, it is enhanced by flow diverted inshore from the shelfbreak north of the strait, with little input from the Greenland Ice Sheet. This onshore flow is due to both downwelling-favorable winds pushing fresh water closer to the coast and a geostrophic onshore flow induced by the widening of the shelf at Denmark Strait. This process may be broadly applicable to other buoyant coastal current systems. Last, surface drifter tracks along the East Greenland shelf demonstrate that the coastal current flows continuously from Fram Strait to Cape Farewell.

https://advances.sciencemag.org/content/6/43/eabc4254
 

trichrider

Kiss My Ring
Veteran
The uncertain future of the oceans

Study analyzes the reaction of plankton communities to increased carbon dioxide


26 October 2020 / Kiel. Marine food webs and biogeochemical cycles react very sensitively to the increase in carbon dioxide (CO2) - but the effects are far more complex than previously thought. This is shown in a study published by a team of researchers from the GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel in the journal Nature Climate Change. Data were combined from five large-scale field experiments, which investigated how the carbon cycle within plankton communities reacts to the increase of CO2.

The ocean plays a key role in the current climate change, as it absorbs a considerable part of the atmospheric carbon dioxide emitted by mankind. On the one hand, this slows down the heating of the climate, and on the other hand, the dissolution of CO2 in seawater leads to acidification of the oceans. This has far-reaching consequences for many marine organisms and thus also for the oceanic carbon cycle. One of the most important mechanisms in this cycle, is called the biological carbon pump. Part of the biomass that phytoplankton forms in the surface ocean through photosynthesis sinks to the depths in the form of small carbonaceous particles. As a result, the carbon is stored for a long time in the deep sea. The ocean thus acts as a carbon sink in the climate system. How strongly this biological pump acts varies greatly from region to region and depends on the composition of species in the ecosystem.
The study, which has now been published in the journal Nature Climate Change, is one of the most comprehensive studies so far on the effects of ocean acidification on marine ecosystems. Scientists at the GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research in Kiel have now been able to show for the first time that ocean acidification influences the carbon content of sinking organic material, and thus the biological pump. Surprisingly, the observed changes were highly variable. The carbon content of sinking particles increased or decreased significantly with increasing CO2, depending on the composition of species and the structure of the food web. Since the underlying data cover a wide range of ocean regions, this seems to be a global phenomenon. These findings allow a completely new assessment of the effects of ocean acidification.
Dr. Jan Taucher, marine biologist and main author of the study, says: "Interestingly, we found that bacterial and animal plankton, such as small crustaceans, play a key role in how the carbon cycle and biological pump respond to ocean acidification. Until now, it has been widely held that biogeochemical changes are mainly driven by reactions of phytoplankton. Therefore, even modern Earth system models do not take into account the interactions we observe between the marine food web and the carbon cycle. Our findings thus help to make climate models more realistic and improve climate projections".
Up to now, most of the knowledge on this topic has been based on idealized laboratory experiments, which only represent ecological interactions and the dynamics of the complex marine food web in a highly simplified way. This makes it difficult to transfer such results to real ocean conditions and project them into the future. In order to gain a more realistic insight, the study summarizes several field experiments that were conducted with large-volume test facilities, so-called mesocosms, in different ocean regions, from arctic to subtropical waters.
Mesocosms are, so to speak, oversized test tubes in the ocean, in which changes in environmental conditions in a closed but otherwise natural ecosystem can be studied. For the present study, a large amount of data from five mesocosm experiments was synthesized to provide a more precise picture of plankton communities and biogeochemical processes within the ecosystem. A total of over ten thousand data points were included in the analysis.
The newly gained knowledge can now be used to implement the complex ecological interactions in Earth system models, thus contributing to further improve climate projections.

Reference:
Taucher, J., T. Boxhammer, L.T. Bach, A. J. Paul, M. Schartau, P. Stange and U. Riebesell, 2020: Changing carbon-to-nitrogen ratios of organic-matter export under ocean acidification. Nat. Clim. Change, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-00915-5


https://www.geomar.de/en/news/article/kohlenstoffkreislauf


Irregular Appearances of Glacial and Interglacial Climate States
A clearer picture of the sequence of glacial and interglacial periods
[26. October 2020] During the last 2.6 million years of Earth’s climate has alterd between glacial and interglacial states. As such, there have been times in which the transition between the two climate states appeared with either regular or irregular periodicity. AWI researcher Peter Köhler has now discovered that the irregular appearance of interglacials has been more frequent than previously thought. His study makes a significant contribution to our understanding of Earth’s fundamental climate changes.
In order to understand human beings’ role in the development of our current climate, we have to look back a long way, since there has always been climate change – albeit over vastly different timescales than the anthropogenic climate change, which is mainly due to the use of fossil fuels over the past 200 years. Without humans, for millions of years, climate altered between glacial and interglacial states over periods of many thousands of years, mainly because of the Earth’s tilt which changes by a few degrees with a periodicity of 41,000 years. This in turn changes the angle at which the sun’s rays strike Earth – and as such the energy that reaches the planet, especially at high latitudes in summer. However, there is strong evidence that during the course of the last 2.6 million years, interglacials have repeatedly been ‘skipped’. The Northern Hemisphere – particularly North America – remained frozen for long periods, despite the angle of the axial tilt changing to such an extent that more solar energy once again reached Earth during the summer, which should have melted the inland ice masses. This means Earth’s tilt can’t be the sole reason for Earth's climate to alter between glacial and interglacial states.



Aerial view of the Beyond EPICA camp (Photo: Beyond EPICA)



In order to solve the puzzle, climate researchers are investigating more closely at what points in Earth’s history irregularities occurred. Together with colleagues at Utrecht University, physicist Peter Köhler from the Alfred Wegener Institute (AWI) has now made a significant contribution towards providing a clearer picture of the sequence of glacial and interglacial periods over the last 2.6 million years. Until now, experts thought that, especially over the past 1.0 million years, glacial and interglacial periods deviated from their 41,000- year cycle, and that interglacial periods were skipped, as a result of which some glacial periods lasted for 80,0000 or even 120,000 years. “For the period between 2.6 and 1.0 million years ago, it was assumed that the rhythm was 41,000 years,” says Peter Köhler. But as his study, which has now been published in the scientific journal Nature Communications, shows, there were also repeated irregularities during the period between 2.6 and 1.0 million years ago.
Köhler’s study is particularly interesting because he re-evaluated a well-known dataset that researchers have been using for several years – the LR04 climate dataset – yet arrived at completely different conclusions. This dataset consists of a global evaluation of core samples from deep-sea sediments that are millions of years old, and includes measurements from the ancient shells of microscopic, single-celled marine organisms – foraminifera – that were deposited on the ocean floor. Foraminifera incorporate oxygen from the seawater into their calcium shells. But over millennia, the level of specific oxygen isotopes – oxygen atoms that have differing numbers of neutrons and therefore different masses – varies in seawater.

The LR04 dataset contains measurements of the ratio of the heavy oxygen isotope 18O to the lighter 16O. The ratio of 18O/16O stored in the foraminifera’s shells depends on the water temperature. But there is also another effect that leads to relatively large amounts of 18O being found in the foraminifera’s shells in glacial periods: when, during the course of a glacial period, there is heavy snowfall on land, which leads to the formation of thick ice sheets, the sea level falls – in the period studied, by as much as 120 m. Since 18O is heavier than 16O, water molecules containing this heavy isotope evaporate less readily than molecules containing the lighter isotope. As such, comparatively more 18O remains in the ocean and the 18O content of the foraminifera shells increases. “If you take the LR04 dataset at face value, it means you blur two effects – the influence of ocean temperature and that of land ice, or rather that of sea level change,” says Peter Köhler. “This makes statements regarding the alternation of the glacial periods uncertain.” And there is an additional factor: climate researchers mainly determine the sequence of glacial periods on the basis of glaciation in the Northern Hemisphere. But using 18O values doesn’t allow us to say whether prehistoric glaciation chiefly occurred in the Northern Hemisphere or in Antarctica.


Aerial view of the Beyond EPICA camp (Photo: Beyond EPICA)


Computer model separates the influencing parameters

In an attempt to solve this problem, Köhler and his team evaluated the LR04 dataset in a completely different way. The data was fed into a computer model that simulates the growth and melting of the large continental ice sheets. What sets it apart: the model is capable of separating the influence of temperature and that of sea level change on the 18O concentration. Furthermore, it can accurately analyse where and when snow falls and the ice increases – more in the Northern Hemisphere or in Antarctica. “Mathematicians call this separation a deconvolution,” Köhler explains, “which our model is capable of delivering.” The results show that the sequence of glacials and interglacials was irregular even in the period 2.6 to 1.0 million years ago – a finding that could be crucial in the coming years. As part of the ongoing major EU project ‘BE-OIC (Beyond EPICA Oldest Ice Core)’, researchers are drilling deeper than ever before into the Antarctic ice. With the oldest ice core recovered to date, ‘EPICA’, they have ‘only’ travelled back roughly 800,000 years into the past. The ancient ice provides, among other things, information on how much carbon dioxide Earth’s atmosphere contained at that time. With ‘Beyond EPICA’ they will delve circa 1.5 million years into the past. By combining the carbon dioxide measurements with Köhler’s analyses, valuable insights can be gained into the relation between these two factors – the fluctuations in the sequence of glacials and the carbon dioxide content of the atmosphere. And this can help us understand the fundamental relationship between greenhouse gases and climate changes in Earth’s glacial history.

Original publication

The study has now been released in Nature Communications:
Köhler, P., van de Wal, R.S.W., Interglacials of the Quaternary defined by northern hemispheric land ice distribution outside of Greenland. Nat Commun 11, 5124 (2020). DOI:10.1038/s41467-020-18897-5


one more...


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jCha9_U8Dlk


[youtubeif]jCha9_U8Dlk[/youtubeif]
 

igrowone

Well-known member
Veteran
greetings on a cool but not cold evening in upstate NY
get down to it and it just isn't all that cold in many places
enjoy the hot up in northern Siberia, what could it hurt?

Monthly Temperature: November 2020

The combined global average temperature over the land and ocean surfaces for November 2020 was 0.97°C (1.75°F) above the 20th century average of 12.9°C (55.2°F). This was the second warmest November in the 141-year global record, behind the record warm November set in 2015 (+1.01°C / +1.82°F). The 10 warmest Novembers have all occurred since 2004; the five warmest Novembers have occurred since 2013. November 2020 also marked the 44th consecutive November and the 431st consecutive month with temperatures, at least nominally, above the 20th-century average.
The month of November was characterized by warmer-than-average temperatures across much of the globe, with the most notable warm temperature departures from average across western and northern Alaska, most of the contiguous U.S., northern Europe, northern Asia, Australia, and across parts of South America, the North Pacific Ocean, the Bering Sea and parts of the western Antarctic, where temperatures were at least 3.0°C (5.4°F) above average. Record-warm November temperatures were observed across parts each of the continents where data is available and across parts of all of the major oceans. As a whole, about 6.74% of the world's land and ocean surfaces had a record-warm November temperature—the fourth highest November percentage since records began in 1951. Only Novembers of 2015 (9.73%), 2019 (9.23%), and 2010 (7.61%) had a higher percentage of record warm November temperatures. Cooler-than-average November temperatures were observed across parts of Canada, northern Africa, southwestern Asia, across the eastern and central tropical Pacific Ocean, the northern Atlantic and southern oceans. However, no land or ocean areas had record-cold November temperatures.

November 2020 Blended Land and Sea Surface
Temperature Anomalies in degrees Celsius


November 2020 Blended Land and Sea Surface
Temperature Percentiles

According to NCEI's regional analysis, Oceania had its warmest November on record, with a temperature departure from average of +2.06°C (+3.71°F). This value shattered the previous record of 1.85°C (3.33°F) by 0.21°C (0.38°F). Seven of Oceania's ten warmest Novembers have occurred since 2002. Australia had its warmest November in the nation's 111-year record with a national mean temperature departure of +2.47°C (+4.45°F). This surpassed the now second highest November temperature set in 2014 by 0.40°C (0.72°F). The national maximum and minimum temperatures were also the highest on record. All regions had a top five warm November, with South Australia and the Northern Territory having their warmest November on record. New Zealand also had a very warm November, with a national temperature of 14.6°C (58.3°F) or 0.9°C (1.6°F) above the 1981–2010 average. November 2020 marked New Zealand's 46th consecutive month with temperatures above average. Several locations across New Zealand had a top five warm November. Of note, the town of Motueka had their warmest November since temperature records began in 1956.
Europe, as a whole, had its second highest November temperature departure on record at +2.15°C (+3.87°F), which is 0.33°C (0.59°F) less than the record set in 2015. The United Kingdom's national mean temperature for November 2020 was 7.7°C (45.9°F) or 1.5°C (2.7°F) above average—this was the sixth highest since national records began in 1884. Regionally, England and Scotland had their fifth warmest November on record. According to Norway's Meteorologisk Institutt, Norway's November 2020 temperature was 4.6°C (8.3°F) above average and tied with 2011 as the highest November since national records began in 1900. Spain had its third warmest November since national records began in 1961, with a temperature departure of 2.0°C (3.6°F) above average. Only Novembers of 1983 and 2006 were warmer.
South America (third warmest), the Hawaiian region (fourth warmest), and Asia (fifth warmest) had a November temperature that ranked among the five highest on record. November 2020 was Kingdom of Bahrain's warmest November since national records began in 1902, with a mean temperature departure of +1.9°C (+3.4°F). The previous record set in 1954 and, again in 2017, was 0.2°C (0.4°F) cooler. The nation's minimum and maximum temperatures were the second and fifth highest on record, respectively.
 

trichrider

Kiss My Ring
Veteran
November 2020 La Niña update: just us chickens
Author:
Emily Becker
November 12, 2020

La Niña strengthened over October, with both the tropical Pacific Ocean and the atmosphere clearly reflecting La Niña conditions. Forecasters estimate at least a 95% chance La Niña will last through the winter, with a 65% chance of it hanging on through the spring.


The October sea surface temperature anomaly (departure from the long-term average) in the Niño 3.4 region of tropical Pacific was -1.3°C according to the ERSSTv5 dataset, substantially cooler than the La Niña threshold of -0.5°C. This is the eighth-strongest negative October value in the ERSSTv5 record, which dates back to 1950. I’ll talk more about feats of strength (vis-à-vis La Niña, that is) later.
oissta-monthly-nnvl--620x365--2020-10-00.png


October 2020 sea surface temperature departure from the 1981-2010 average. Lots of cool water at the equator in the Pacific. Image from Data Snapshots on Climate.gov.

Let’s count our chickens

First, we’ll check in with the tropical Pacific ocean-atmosphere system. One of the ways we monitor the atmospheric response to ENSO is through satellite images of the amount of thermal radiation leaving the Earth’s surface. Clouds block this outgoing long-wave radiation, so when the satellites see less outgoing long-wave radiation than average, it means more clouds and rain than average. Conversely, when the satellite picks up more OLR, the skies are clearer than average.


During La Niña, we’d expect to see less rain than average over the central tropical Pacific and more rain over Indonesia—the strengthened Walker circulation, La Niña’s atmospheric response. The OLR map for October 2020 shows this pattern clearly.
IRI_OLRanom_Oct2020_sm.png


Outgoing long-wave radiation anomaly in October 2020. Regions with more clouds and rain than average are shown in green; areas with fewer clouds and less rain are shown in brown. Figure from the IRI from CPC data.

Another component of the strengthened Walker circulation is stronger Pacific trade winds, the near-surface winds that blow from east to west near the equator, and stronger west-to-east winds high up in the atmosphere. Both strengthened wind patterns were observed during October, providing more evidence that the ocean-atmosphere coupling we expect during both phases of ENSO is present.


As Michelle discussed just a couple of weeks ago, this coupling is a feedback mechanism that strengthens ENSO. In the case of La Niña, cooler-than-average waters in the tropical Pacific mean the difference between the warm western Pacific and the cooler central Pacific is greater than average. This greater difference leads to the stronger Walker circulation, and the stronger trade winds further cool the surface water in the central Pacific and also pile up warm water in the west. For more details on this feedback, and a whiff of fresh-baked bread, check out Michelle’s post.


Eggs in baskets

Several computer models are suggesting that this La Niña is likely to be a stronger event, with a Niño 3.4 anomaly during November–January cooler than -1.5°C.
NMME_plume_graph_202011_620_1.png


Climate model forecasts for the Niño3.4 Index. Dynamical model data (black line) from the North American Multi-Model Ensemble (NMME): darker gray envelope shows the range of 68% of all model forecasts; lighter gray shows the range of 95% of all model forecasts. NOAA Climate.gov image from University of Miami data.

The substantial atmospheric coupling supports these predictions, as does the amount of cooler water under the surface. These cooler subsurface waters, which are also evidence of the coupled system, will provide a source of cooler-than-average water for the surface over the next few months. October’s average subsurface temperature was the 7th-coolest October since 1979.
The Climate Prediction Center is now providing a probabilistic outlook for the strength of El Niño and La Niña events. Tom described this new technique in a blog post a little while back—it’s too much to get into here, so please check out his post for the details. While forecast probabilities are provided for every season, it is the November–January season that has the largest chance (54%) of Niño-3.4 being below -1.5°C. This would make it a strong event; of the 23 La Niña events since 1950, seven have had maximum Niño 3.4 cooler than -1.5°C.


What came first

As we’ve observed in a few earlier posts about this La Niña, it appears to be relatively rare in our observed record (starting in 1950) for La Niña to develop following a neutral or slightly warm winter like we had in 2019–2020. I got curious about this, so I thought I’d exercise my newfound Python skills a bit and look at the data. (Python is a computer programming language. I’m not a snake wrangler…yet!)
ENSOblog_Nov-Jan_v_Oct_Nino34_620.png


Relationship between the Niño3.4 index in one November–January (vertical axis) with the Niño3.4 the following October (horizontal axis). Figure by climate.gov; data from CPC.

It turns out that the previous La Niña events we’ve observed so far (dots below the blue line) have all been preceded by either El Niño or La Niña. 2020 stands out, following a winter where tropical Pacific sea surface temperatures were slightly warm, but not quite El Niño. Since we only have about 70 years of observations, it’s hard to say exactly how unusual this is—we’d need to do more studies with climate models to find out, but that’s a lot for my monthly ENSO Blog post, to say nothing of my Python skills!


When the conditions come home to roost

We pay so much attention to ENSO because it affects global weather and climate; a stronger La Niña event means these effects are more likely. We’ve already seen hints of some of the weather and climate patterns we’d expect during La Niña. The most obvious one of these is the extraordinarily active Atlantic hurricane season. La Niña leads to reduced shear (the change in wind from the surface to the upper levels) in the atmosphere over the Atlantic, allowing hurricanes to grow and strengthen.


Although October is a little early for clear La Niña impacts, global precipitation and temperature patterns during the month did give some hints of a La Niña effect, including more rain in Indonesia, drier conditions in southeastern China and the U.S. Southwest, and cooler weather in Canada and into the U.S. Northern Plains. I wrote about potential impacts in more detail last month, so check that out if you missed it.


https://climate.gov/news-features/blogs/enso/november-2020-la-niña-update-just-us-chickens
 

St. Phatty

Active member
in Southern Oregon, we have lost the hope for a White Christmas.

it's OK with me, I'd rather not be snowed in like in some previous years.

I walked up to the top of the hill this morning, and noticed that the back hill was already getting started on 2021 grass crop.

Little tiny grass seedlings everywhere that there is exposed soil.
 

trichrider

Kiss My Ring
Veteran
warmer, drier, windier during la nina.
did you experience the pineapple express winds and temps yet this year phatty?

Solar Radiation in the Arctic during the Early Twentieth-Century Warming (1921–50): Presenting a Compilation of Newly Available Data

R. Przybylak 1 , P. N. Svyashchennikov 2 , J. Uscka-Kowalkowska 3 and P. Wyszy?ski 4
Published-online: 24 Nov 2020 Print Publication: 01 Jan 2021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0257.1 Page(s): 21–37


Abstract

The early twentieth-century warming (ETCW), defined as occurring within the period 1921–50, saw a clear increase in actinometric observations in the Arctic. Nevertheless, information on radiation balance and its components at that time is still very limited in availability, and therefore large discrepancies exist among estimates of total solar irradiance forcing. To eliminate these uncertainties, all available solar radiation data for the Arctic need to be collected and processed. Better knowledge about incoming solar radiation (direct, diffuse, and global) should allow for more reliable estimation of the magnitude of total solar irradiance forcing, which can help, in turn, to more precisely and correctly explain the reasons for the ETCW in the Arctic. The paper summarizes our research into the availability of solar radiation data for the Arctic. An important part of this work is its detailed inventory of data series (including metadata) for the period before the mid-twentieth century. Based on the most reliable data series, general solar conditions in the Arctic during the ETCW are described. The character of solar radiation changes between the ETCW and present times, in particular after 2000, is also analyzed. Average annual global solar radiation in the Russian Arctic during the ETCW was slightly greater than in the period 1964–90 (by about 1–2 W·m?2) and was markedly greater than in the period 2001–19 (by about 16 W·m?2). Our results also reveal that in the period 1920–2019 three phases of solar radiation changes can be distinguished: a brightening phase (1921–50), a stabilization phase (1951–93), and a dimming phase (after 2000).


https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/clim/34/1/jcliD200257.xml


The 2017 reversal of the Beaufort Gyre: Can dynamic thickening of a seasonal ice cover during a reversal limit summer ice melt in the Beaufort Sea?

D.G. Babb
J.C. Landy
J.V. Lukovich
C. Haas
S. Hendricks
D.G. Barber
R.J. Galley

First published: 21 November 2020
https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JC016796

This article has been accepted for publication and undergone full peer review but has not been through the copyediting, typesetting, pagination and proofreading process, which may lead to differences between this version and the Version of Record. Please cite this article as doi: 10.1029/2020JC016796

Abstract

During winter 2017 the semi?permanent Beaufort High collapsed and the anticyclonic Beaufort Gyre reversed. The reversal drove eastward ice motion through the Western Arctic, causing sea ice to converge against Banks Island, and halted the circulation of multiyear sea ice via the gyre, preventing its replenishment in the Beaufort Sea. Prior to the reversal, an anomalously thin seasonal ice cover had formed in the Beaufort following ice?free conditions during September 2016. With the onset of the reversal in January 2017, convergence drove uncharacteristic dynamic thickening during winter. By the end of March, despite seasonal ice comprising 97% of the ice cover, the reversal created the thickest, roughest and most voluminous regional ice cover of the CryoSat?2 record. Within the Beaufort Sea, previous work has shown that winter ice export can precondition the region for increased summer ice melt, but that a short reversal during April 2013 contributed to a reduction in summer ice loss. Hence the deformed ice cover at the end of winter 2017 could be expected to limit summer melt. In spite of this, the Beaufort ice cover fell to its fourth lowest September area as the gyre re?established during April and divergent ice drift broke up the pack, negating the reversal's earlier preconditioning. Our work highlights that dynamic winter thickening of a regional sea ice cover, for instance during a gyre reversal, offers the potential to limit summer ice loss, but that dynamic forcing during spring dictates whether this conditioning carries through to the melt season.

Plain Language Summary

The Beaufort Gyre is a semi?permanent feature that transports sea ice clockwise from the High Arctic through the Beaufort and Chukchi Seas. Occasionally the Gyre reverses, transporting sea ice counterclockwise. Historically these reversals only occurred during summer, but as the arctic changes reversals have become more frequent and more pronounced, and during winter 2017 the gyre underwent a prolonged reversal. Using a mix of satellite?based and in situ observations we examine how this reversal affected the ice cover of the Western Arctic. By altering the patterns of sea ice motion and forcing sea ice in the Beaufort Sea to converge against the coast, the reversal transformed the ice cover from an anomalously thin seasonal ice cover in fall to an anomalously thick and rough ice cover by the end of winter. Theoretically this conditioned the ice cover for limited summer ice loss. However this was not the case as the ice cover broke up prematurely during spring, allowing the sun to warm surface waters and melt the ice through the ice?albedo feedback. By September the ice cover fell to its fourth lowest regional minimum as the Beaufort ice cover continues to decline.


https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/2020JC016796


Larger Sensitivity of Arctic Precipitation Phase to Aerosol than Greenhouse Gas Forcing

Shifeng Pan
Tingfeng Dou
Lei Lin
Jiao Yang
Feng Zhang
Mingkeng Duan
Chuanfeng Zhao
Hong Liao
Cunde Xiao

First published: 20 November 2020
https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL090452

Abstract

The sensitivity of the Arctic precipitation phases (solid and liquid) to the forcings from greenhouse gases (GHGs) and aerosols over 2016–2080 was investigated by using the Community Earth System Model Version 1. Results show that the warming caused by the two forcings results in an increasing trend in total precipitation and a solid?to?liquid precipitation transition in the Arctic. Under RCP8.5 scenario, the increased rate of Arctic mean precipitation with global warming forced by aerosol reduction (7.7%/°C) is twice greater than that by increased GHG emission (3.5%/°C). The sensitivity of rainfall to precipitation ratio (RPR) to various forcings is much higher than that of total precipitation in the Arctic. The increased rate of RPR due to global aerosol forcing (8.4%/°C) is approximately 3 times that due to GHG forcing (2.9%/°C) in the Arctic, the differences even larger over Greenland and the eastern Arctic Ocean, resulting in more rainfall in these areas.

Plain Language Summary

The precipitation phase is extremely sensitive to temperature changes, especially in the Arctic. Solid and liquid precipitation have almost the opposite effect on the ground energy budget. The changes in precipitation phase can greatly affect snow and ice mass balance, regulating the regional hydrological cycle. The transition from solid precipitation to liquid precipitation can even promote carbon release over the permafrost through changing the rate of snow melting. We evaluated the impacts of the two most important anthropogenic forcing agents (greenhouse gases [GHGs] and aerosols) on the changes of precipitation phases in the Arctic using a state?of?the?art Earth system model. We found that the warming forced by global aerosol reduction and increased GHG emission leads to a solid?to?liquid precipitation transition and therefore more rainfall events in the Arctic. Under RCP8.5 scenario, the sensitivity of Arctic precipitation phase to global aerosol forcing is approximately 3 times that to the GHG forcing, and the most sensitive phase changes of Arctic precipitation to the aerosol forcing are observed in Greenland and the eastern Arctic Ocean. Understanding the impact of human activities on the changes in the Arctic precipitation phase will help formulate reasonable emission reduction policies and better adapt to the rapid Arctic climate changes in the future.


https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2020GL090452
 

trichrider

Kiss My Ring
Veteran
https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/2011/2011.06708.pdf


Empirical evidence for a global atmospheric temperature control system: physical structure

L. Mark W. Leggett* & David A. Ball Global Risk Policy Group Pty Ltd, Townsville, Queensland, Australia *mleggett.globalriskprogress@gmail.com29


September 2020

Abstract

There is evidence that a natural control system influences global atmospheric surface temperature (Leggett and Ball, 2020). The present paper sets up and tests a hypothesis concerning the physical makeup of the sequential elements of the control system and its outcomes. The final outcome the control system influences is defined as global atmospheric surface temperature.

The terms used for the control system element types in the hypothesis are, in sequence: leading element, controller and actuator. Actuators are hypothesized to affect, in turn, the final outcome: either directly, or via penultimate outcomes.



The existence of the control system is evidenced by demonstration of statistically significant one-way Granger causality across each step of the hypothesized control system sequence. Evidence is presented that the leading element of the control system, represented by the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index, is the global biosphere.



The biosphere as a control system has previously been referred to as Gaia (Lovelock and Margulis, 1974). A fourth, second-derivative, term is found to enhance the Proportional, Integral and Derivative process terms of the control system shown in Leggett and Ball (2020).



The main actuators of the control system found are shown to be wind speed and cloud cover. Cloud cover is shown to influence the final outcome, global surface temperature, directly. It and wind speed also influence the penultimate outcomes found, those of enhanced ocean heat uptake and enhanced outgoing long-wave radiation. These together lead to control system output to the final outcome, global atmospheric temperature.



Overall, evidence for the activity of the control system is present across many major physical dimensions of the Earth’s atmosphere.



1. Introduction In Leggett and Ball (2020), we provided statistically significant observational evidence that a feedback control system moderating atmospheric temperature is presently operating coherently at global scale. Further, this control system was shown to be of a sophisticated type, displaying controller process terms with proportional-integral-derivative characteristics.



This paper provides further evidence about the controller process terms of the control system, and also about its physical components.



https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/2011/2011.06708.pdf



 

White Beard

Active member
Kudos where they’re due: posting up a lot of very interesting stuff - thanks,


A new study finds a trigger for the Little Ice Age that cooled Europe from the 1300s through mid-1800s, and supports surprising model results suggesting that under the right conditions sudden climate changes can occur spontaneously, without external forcing.
The study, published in Science Advances, reports a comprehensive reconstruction of sea ice transported from the Arctic Ocean through the Fram Strait, by Greenland, and into the North Atlantic Ocean over the last 1400 years. The reconstruction suggests that the Little Ice Age—which was not a true ice age but a regional cooling centered on Europe—was triggered by an exceptionally large outflow of sea ice from the Arctic Ocean into the North Atlantic in the 1300s.
While previous experiments using numerical climate models showed that increased sea ice was necessary to explain long-lasting climate anomalies like the Little Ice Age, physical evidence was missing. This study digs into the geological record for confirmation of model results.
Researchers pulled together records from marine sediment cores drilled from the ocean floor from the Arctic Ocean to the North Atlantic to get a detailed look at sea ice throughout the region over the last 1400 years.
“We decided to put together different strands of evidence to try to reconstruct spatially and temporally what the sea ice was during the past one and a half thousand years, and then just see what we found,” said Martin Miles, an INSTAAR researcher who also holds an appointment with NORCE Norwegian Research Centre and Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research in Norway.
The cores included compounds produced by algae that live in sea ice, the shells of single-celled organisms that live in different water temperatures, and debris that sea ice picks up and transports over long distances. The cores were detailed enough to detect abrupt (decadal scale) changes in sea ice and ocean conditions over time.
The records indicate an abrupt increase in Arctic sea ice exported to the North Atlantic starting around 1300, peaking in midcentury, and ending abruptly in the late 1300s.

View Image The map shows Greenland and adjacent ocean currents. Colored circles show where some of the sediment cores used in the study were obtained from the seafloor. The small historical map from the beginning of the 20th century shows the distribution of Storis, or sea ice from the Arctic Ocean, which flows down the east coast of Greenland. The graphs show the reconstructed time series of changes in the occurrence of sea ice and polar waters in the past. The colors of the curves correspond to the locations on the map. The blue shading represents the period of increased sea ice in the 1300s. The figures are modified from Miles et al., 2020. “I've always been fascinated by not just looking at sea ice as a passive indicator of climate change, but how it interacts with or could actually lead to changes in the climate system on long timescales,” said Miles. “And the perfect example of that could be the Little Ice Age.”
“This specific investigation was inspired by an INSTAAR colleague, Giff Miller, as well as by some of the paleoclimate reconstructions of my INSTAAR colleagues Anne Jennings, John Andrews, and Astrid Ogilvie,” added Miles. Miller authored the first paper to suggest that sea ice played an essential role in sustaining the Little Ice Age.
Scientists have argued about the causes of the Little Ice Age for decades, with many suggesting that explosive volcanic eruptions must be essential for initiating the cooling period and allowing it to persist over centuries. One the hand, the new reconstruction provides robust evidence of a massive sea-ice anomaly that could have been triggered by increased explosive volcanism. On the other hand, the same evidence supports an intriguing alternate explanation.
Climate models called “control models” are run to understand how the climate system works through time without being influenced by outside forces like volcanic activity or greenhouse gas emissions. A set of recent control model experiments included results that portrayed sudden cold events that lasted several decades. The model results seemed too extreme to be realistic—so-called Ugly Duckling simulations—and researchers were concerned that they were showing problems with the models.
Miles’ study found that there may be nothing wrong with those models at all.
“We actually find that number one, we do have physical, geological evidence that these several decade-long cold sea ice excursions in the same region can, in fact do, occur,” he said. In the case of the Little Ice Age, “what we reconstructed in space and time was strikingly similar to the development in an Ugly Duckling model simulation, in which a spontaneous cold event lasted about a century. It involved unusual winds, sea ice export, and a lot more ice east of Greenland, just as we found in here.” The provocative results show that external forcing from volcanoes or other causes may not be necessary for large swings in climate to occur. Miles continued, “These results strongly suggest...that these things can occur out of the blue due to internal variability in the climate system.”
The marine cores also show a sustained, far-flung pulse of sea ice near the Norse colonies on Greenland coincident with their disappearance in the 15th century. A debate has raged over why the colonies vanished, usually agreeing only that a cooling climate pushed hard on their resilience. Miles and his colleagues would like to factor in the oceanic changes nearby: very large amounts of sea ice and cold polar waters, year after year for nearly a century.
“This massive belt of ice that comes streaming out of the Arctic—in the past and even today—goes all the way around Cape Farewell to around where these colonies were,” Miles said. He would like to look more closely into oceanic conditions along with researchers who study the social sciences in relation to climate.

https://instaar.colorado.edu/news-e...triggered-the-little-ice-age-finds-new-study/
:wave:


I thought this was very interesting: haven’t dug in, but it sounds like they’ve done amazing work. Raises a very clear question they don’t address: what triggered that extraordinary volume of ice? It didn’t come from *nowhere* - the extraordinary is the result of extraordinary inputs: factors not “ordinary” at all.

Another stop along the trail to the real answers
 

White Beard

Active member
As War Danger Mounts In The Arctic, Peace Hinges On Revival Of The Wallace Doctrine

Fascinating to see Henry Wallace come into the conversation. Ironically, I can’t seem to support his idea at this time: I don’t think it would be a good idea to enact that old plan in today’s much less stable environment. I was never a Russia-hater, but I try to be a realist; I’m not convinced we’re in any position to effectively define, target, and secure our own best interests in such a massive undertaking. We need to get our civil house in order, and that will take time - if we’re smart.

Thanks again. Long time since I saw anything interesting out of zerohedge.
 
Top